Open AccessSignal‐Averaged P‐Wave Analysis of Normal Controls and Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Study in Gender Differences, Age Dependence, and Reproducibility
Author(s) -
Dhala Anwer,
Underwood Donald,
Leman Robert,
Madu Ernest,
Baugh Dainia,
Ozawa Yukio,
Kasamaki Yuji,
Xue Qiuzhen,
Reddy Shankara
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
clinical cardiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.263
H-Index - 72
eISSN - 1932-8737
pISSN - 0160-9289
DOI - 10.1002/clc.4960251109
Subject(s) - medicine , atrial fibrillation , cardiology , reproducibility , atrium (architecture) , p wave , electrocardiography , percentile , stroke (engine) , paroxysmal atrial fibrillation , signal averaged electrocardiogram , signal averaging , mathematics , statistics , mechanical engineering , electrical engineering , signal transfer function , digital signal processing , analog signal , engineering
Abstract Background : Atrial fibrillation is often first recognized after a complication such as embolic stroke has occurred. Limited data are available for the prospective identification of patients at risk for developing atrial fibrillation. Hypothesis : Demonstration of areas of slow conduction in the atrium by means of P‐wave signal averaging may identify individuals at risk for atrial fibrillation. Methods : P‐wave signal averaging from the surface electrocardiogram was performed in 199 normal controls and 81 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation using an automated, P‐triggered, high‐resolution signal for analysis. Results : Of the variables measured, the filtered P‐wave duration and P‐wave integral were significantly different between controls and patients (filtered P‐wave duration 120 ± 9 vs. 145 ± 21 and P‐wave integral 666 ± 208 vs. 868 ± 352), whereas the terminal root‐mean‐square (RMS) voltages (RMS 20, RMS 30, RMS 40) showed no significant differences between the two groups. Regression analysis of the first and second measurement of the filtered P‐wave duration obtained during consecutive tests showed excellent reproducibility (r and r 2 of 0.96 and 0.92). The duration of the filtered P wave showed no age dependence but was shorter in women. Conclusion : Utilizing the 90th percentile value of the filtered P‐wave duration of 13 3 ms in men and 13 0 ms in women, the sensitivity was 80 and 81%, the specificity 92 and 90%, the positive predictive value 84 and 73%, and the negative predictive value 90 and 93%, respectively.