z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Long‐term management—The way forward?
Author(s) -
Wallentin Lars
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
clinical cardiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.263
H-Index - 72
eISSN - 1932-8737
pISSN - 0160-9289
DOI - 10.1002/clc.4960231305
Subject(s) - medicine , placebo , aspirin , revascularization , myocardial infarction , enoxaparin sodium , clinical endpoint , antithrombotic , coronary artery disease , low molecular weight heparin , heparin , cardiology , randomized controlled trial , surgery , anesthesia , alternative medicine , pathology
The mainstay of treatment for unstable coronary artery disease (UCAD) currently consists of antithrombotic therapy with aspirin plus unfractionated heparin (UFH), together with anti‐ischemic treatment with beta blockers and nitrates. Recently, there has been a trend toward replacement of UFH with low‐molecular‐weight heparins (LMWHs), since these products offer significant advantages over the parent compound. Several lines of evidence suggest that prolongation of treatment with LMWHs beyond the acute phase may be appropriate in patients with UCAD. The Fragmin and Fast Revascularization during Instability in Coronary artery disease (FRISC II) study was designed to evaluate this hypothesis using the LMWH dalteparin sodium (Fragmin ® ). A factorial design was used to randomize patients enrolled in the FRISC II study to an invasive or noninvasive management strategy, and to treatment with dalteparin sodium or placebo. Treatment with dalteparin sodium significantly reduced incidences of death and/or myocardial infarction (MI) during the first months of treatment (the reduction in the relative risk of double endpoint events was statistically significant at 47.0% at 1 month, and remained so at 2 months, but was no longer statistically significant at the 3‐month assessment). However, risk, as defined by the triple endpoint of death, MI, and revascularization, was significantly lower (13.0% relative risk reduction) at 3‐month follow‐up in the treatment group randomized to dalteparin sodium than among patients receiving placebo. in patients in whom revascularization procedures were carried out, the risk of new, postprocedural events was low in both the placebo and dalteparin sodium arms. Thus, dalteparin sodium appears to protect patients from cardiac events until they undergo invasive procedures, and it can therefore be used as a bridge to revascularization.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here