Open AccessA comparison of brachial artery row‐mediated vasodilation using upper and lower arm arterial occlusion in subjects with and without coronary risk factors
Author(s) -
Vogel Robert A.,
Corretti Mary C.,
Plotnick Gary D.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
clinical cardiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.263
H-Index - 72
eISSN - 1932-8737
pISSN - 0160-9289
DOI - 10.1002/clc.4960230805
Subject(s) - medicine , brachial artery , reactive hyperemia , vasodilation , radial artery , cuff , cardiology , occlusion , blood flow , forearm , blood pressure , endothelial dysfunction , anesthesia , artery , surgery
Background : The ultrasound assessment of brachial artery flow‐mediated vasodilation provides a noninvasive means for measuring endothelial function. The test is performed using either upper or lower arm blood pressure cuff arterial occlusion to induce hyperemia. Upper arm occlusion produces a greater hyperemic stimulus. Brachial artery flow‐mediated vasodilation is abnormal in the presence of coronary risk factors. Hypothesis : The study sought to compare the ability of the upper and lower arm occlusion techniques to differentiate endothelial function in subjects with and without risk factors. Methods : We measured brachial artery flow‐mediated vasodilation in 20 subjects, 10 without and 10 with a single risk factor (hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, or cigarette smoking) using both the upper and lower arm occlusion techniques (5 min blood pressure cuff occlusion). Using 11 MHz ultrasound, Doppler blood flow velocities were measured before and immediately after cuff deflation. Brachial artery vasodilation was measured 1 min after cuff deflation, compared with baseline, and expressed as a percent increase. Results : The immediately postocclusion hyperemia (% increase in flow) was significantly greater (p<0.01) using the upper versus the lower arm technique in both the normal (530 ± 152 vs. 383 ± 51 %) and the risk factor (583 ± 153 vs. 409 ± 114%) groups. Row‐mediated vasodilation was significantly greater (p < 0.01) using the upper arm versus the lower arm occlusion technique in both the normal (13.4 ± 5.3 vs. 5.6 ± 3.4%) and risk factor (7.9 ± 3.6 vs. 3.9 ± 2.2%) groups. Vasodilation was significantly greater (p < 0.01) in the normal subjects than in the risk factor subjects (13.4 ± 5.3 vs. 7.9 ± 3.6%) using the upper arm technique, but was not statistically different in the two groups using the lower arm technique. Conclusions : Our study demonstrates that upper arm compared with lower arm cuff occlusion undertaken to induce hyperemia for the assessment of brachial artery flow‐mediated vasodilation results in significantly greater hyperemia and vasodilation. Flow‐mediated vasodilation obtained using the upper arm technique better separates subjects with and without coronary risk factors.