Open AccessEffect of enalapril initiated early after acute myocardial infarction on heart failure parameters, with reference to clinical class and echocardiographic determinants
Author(s) -
Edner Magnus,
Bonarjee Ver V. S.,
Nilsen Dennis W. T.,
Berning Jens,
Carstensen Steen,
Caidahl Kenneth
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
clinical cardiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.263
H-Index - 72
eISSN - 1932-8737
pISSN - 0160-9289
DOI - 10.1002/clc.4960190705
Subject(s) - medicine , enalapril , cardiology , ejection fraction , heart failure , myocardial infarction , myocardial infarction complications , angiotensin converting enzyme , blood pressure
Background and hypothesis : Although the angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril has recently been shown to reduce mortality and the need for hospitalization in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and congestive heart failure, this drug was found to have no significant impact on short‐term mortality after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the CONSENSUS II trial. The effect of enalapril initiated early after AMI on clinical and echocardiographic determinants of left ventricular (LV) function was studied in a subset of patients from CONSENSUS II Methods : Symptoms and signs of heart failure were classified as NYHA and dyspnea classes. Echocardiography included LV end‐systolic volumes (ESV) and end‐diastolic volumes (EDV), as well as ejection fraction (EF). wall motion index (WMI), and mitral flow indices. In all, 428 patients were included and followed for an average of 5.1 months by serial examinations, starting 2–5 days after myocardial infarction (MI) and repeated after 1 month and at the completion of the study. Results : There was no beneficial effect of enalapril on clinically determined function. Changes (i.e. changes in NYHA class) in the functional status remained correlated with changes in echocardiographic determinants throughout the study in patients belonging to the placebo group: EDV index (r=0.36, p = 0.002, ESV index (r = 0.49, p < 0.001), EF (r = ‐0.41, p < 0.001), and WMI (r=0.29, p = 0.008). In a stepwise logistic regression model, the best baseline parameters to predict NYHA class at final visit in all patients were age (p = 0.014) and ESV index (p = 0.001). Conclusion : Enalapril treatment for an average period of 5.1 months following MI resulted in no clinically significant beneficial effects on NYHA and dyspnea class. Changes in clinical function class were correlated with changes in echocardiographic determinants in placebo‐treated patients, but not in patients given enalapril.