
Management of the patient following coronary thrombolysis
Author(s) -
Massel D.,
Gill J. B.,
Cairns J. A.
Publication year - 1990
Publication title -
clinical cardiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.263
H-Index - 72
eISSN - 1932-8737
pISSN - 0160-9289
DOI - 10.1002/clc.4960130904
Subject(s) - medicine , thrombolysis , cardiology , medical emergency , medline , intensive care medicine , myocardial infarction , political science , law
Myocardial salvage can be maximized by the early institution of thrombolytic therapy and aspirin. Certain patients may benefit from the administration of intravenous heparin, beta blockers, or nitroglycerin. The routine use of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) or calcium‐channel blockers does not appear to be warranted. Recurrent myocardial ischemia should be vigorously treated with medical therapy and there may be value in cardiac catheterization, followed by PTCA or bypass surgery, depending upon the extent of myocardium at risk and the underlying coronary anatomy. Long‐term morbidity and mortality may be reduced by instituting aspirin and beta blockers as well as by modifying risk factors. There is no evidence for the long‐term benefit from any calcium‐channel blocker. Oral anticoagulation may be warranted in those patients with a mural thrombus, congestive heart failure, or atrial fibrillation. ACE inhibitors may be of value in the presence of left ventricular dysfunction and certainly in the presence of symptomatic congestive heart failure. Antiarrhythmic therapy is generally indicated only for symptomatic or life‐threatening arrhythmias. Residual myocardial ischemia should be sought by exercise testing, and those patients with poor exercise tolerance generally warrant cardiac catheterization in consideration for revascularization.