Open AccessRight bundle‐branch block in coronary artery disease: a hemodynamic and angiographic study
Author(s) -
Dabizzi R. P.,
Aiazzi L.,
Barletta G. A.,
Teodori G.
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
clinical cardiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.263
H-Index - 72
eISSN - 1932-8737
pISSN - 0160-9289
DOI - 10.1002/clc.4960110610
Subject(s) - medicine , cardiology , ejection fraction , asynergy , coronary artery disease , myocardial infarction , right bundle branch block , ventricle , left bundle branch block , diastole , bundle branch block , electrocardiography , heart failure , blood pressure , radionuclide ventriculography
Abstract Thirty‐four patients with right bundle‐branch block (RBBB) and coronary artery disease (CAD) (RBBB was not pre‐existent to clinical development of CAD) and 52 consecutive CAD patients without conduction disturbances were studied and compared to verify whether the presence of RBBB implies more severe and extensive left ventricular myocardial damage as well as more severe CAD. The two groups did not differ either in age or in New York Heart Association functional class. The incidence or location of previous myocardial infarction (MI) was not different in the two groups. No significant differences were found in left ventricular volumes or ejection fraction. Higher end‐diastolic left ventricular pressure and more severe and diffuse left ventricular wall asynergy were present in RBBB patients. At coronary arteriography, more severe involvement of the right coronary artery in CAD patients without conduction disturbances was the only significant finding. The group of patients with CAD and RBBB without MI showed significantly less involvement of the left anterior descending coronary artery and significantly more severe damage of the inferior wall of the left ventricle than the group with CAD without RBBB and MI. Patients with inferior wall MI and RBBB had more severe asynergy of the posterobasal region of the left ventricle than did patients with inferior wall MI without RBBB. The group of patients with anterior wall MI and RBBB had a higher left ventricular end‐diastolic pressure, a lower left ventricular ejection fraction, and a greater extent of myocardial damage compared to similar patients of the control group. The groups with MI and RBBB had the same Gensini's score as similar groups without RBBB. The hemodynamic, angiographic, and ventriculographic findings in 14 of the 34 RBBB patients who had also presented an abnormal QRS frontal axis deviation showed no significant differences in comparison both with the CAD control group and the remaining RBBB patients with normal QRS frontal axis. These data support the hypothesis that conduction defects and diffuse left ventricular damage do not emanate from anatomical coronary lesions.