Open AccessQuantitative grading of exercise stress test for patients with coronary artery disease using multivariate discriminant analysis
Author(s) -
Wasir H. S.,
Dev V.,
Narula J.,
Bhatia M. L.
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
clinical cardiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.263
H-Index - 72
eISSN - 1932-8737
pISSN - 0160-9289
DOI - 10.1002/clc.4960110209
Subject(s) - medicine , cardiology , blood pressure , coronary artery disease , depression (economics) , st segment , univariate analysis , st depression , multivariate analysis , myocardial infarction , economics , macroeconomics
A group of 111 male patients who had undergone maximal or symptom‐limited maximal exercise stress testing for evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD) were subjected to coronary angiography. Group I comprised 33 patients with normal or single‐vessel disease (SVD), while 78 patients with double‐vessel disease (DVD) or triple‐vessel disease (TVD) formed Group II. On univariate analysis of the exercise test, the following variables were found to be of significance in discriminating between the two groups: age, exercise duration, double product (heart rate × systolic blood pressure) at peak exercise, duration of ST‐segment depression, number of leads showing ST depression, ST depression of 1 mm or more, configuration of the depressed ST segment, and diastolic blood pressure response to exercise. Multivariate analysis however revealed that only the following five variables had significant discriminant power: number of leads showing ST depression, exercise duration, double product, diastolic pressure response, and ST‐segment configuration. On the basis of their relative importance, a regression equation was developed to give a quantitative score to individual patients. A score of less than zero detected multivessel disease (MVD) with high specificity (94%) and sensitivity (70%), while a score of 15 or more almost excluded MVD (sensitivity 87%). The scoring system as reported here improved the exercise stress test interpretation when compared with the conventional reporting system.