z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Clinical spectrum of “Unstable Angina”
Author(s) -
Bertolasi C. A.,
Tronge J. E.,
Mon G. A.,
Turri D.,
Lugones M. I.
Publication year - 1979
Publication title -
clinical cardiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.263
H-Index - 72
eISSN - 1932-8737
pISSN - 0160-9289
DOI - 10.1002/clc.4960020205
Subject(s) - medicine , myocardial infarction , cardiology , unstable angina , angina , incidence (geometry) , sudden death , infarction , physics , optics
In order to determine the natural evolution of different clinical types of “unstable angina”, 167 patients were included in a prospective study. After angiography, 11 (6.5%) were excluded because they had no significant coronary lesions. The remaining 156 were sorted into different groups according to their clinical characteristics and were followed up for a period of 24 months at least. After that follow‐up period, mortality and incidence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were as follows: angina of recent onset (Class III‐IV NYHA): 8.5% (3/35) and 34.2% (12/35). Progressive angina: 7.4% (2/27) and 7.4% (2/27). Intermediate syndrome: 41.6% (10/24) and 37.5% (9/24). Prinzmetal's angina: 10% (1/10) and 10% (1/10). Post acute myocardial infarction angina: 35% (7/20) and 10% (2/20). Acute persistent ischemia: 2.5% (1/40) and 20% (8/40). Comparison of these figures pointed out significant differences (p < 0.001 for mortality and p < 0.03 for AMI incidence respectively). We conclude that it is clinically possible to identify different groups within the so‐called unstable angina. Such a division not only allows for the creation of more homogeneous groups, but it contributes to a more rational therapeutic approach and also permits identification of high risk prodromes of greater complications, such as myocardial infarction or sudden death.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here