z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Effects of clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor on prevention of stent thrombosis in patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention: A network meta‐analysis
Author(s) -
Chen Wenwen,
Zhang Chen,
Zhao Jian,
Xu Xiuxiu,
Dang Heqin,
Xiao Qiang,
Li Yuanmin,
Hou Haifeng
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
clinical cardiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.263
H-Index - 72
eISSN - 1932-8737
pISSN - 0160-9289
DOI - 10.1002/clc.23536
Subject(s) - prasugrel , ticagrelor , medicine , clopidogrel , percutaneous coronary intervention , conventional pci , p2y12 , cardiology , aspirin , myocardial infarction
Background Clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor, acting on platelet P2Y12 receptor, are commonly used for prevention of stent thrombosis (ST) among patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study aimed to compare the effects of these drugs by a systematic review and network meta‐analysis. Hypothesis Efficacies of clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor on preventing ST are not the same. Methods PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the effect of clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor on prevention of ST in patients who underwent PCI. The efficacies between groups were compared by a Bayesian network meta‐analysis, by which the pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated. Results Fourteen studies and 46 983 participants were included in this study. The pooled results illustrated that clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor were effective on prevention of ST. Patients treated with prasugrel (OR = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.052 ~ 0.73, P < 0.05) and ticagrelor (OR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.035 ~ 0.65, P < 0.05) had lower incidence of ST compared to those treated with clopidogrel. Patients treated with ticagrelor showed similar frequency with those in prasugrel group (OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.22 ~ 2.3, P > 0.05). No significant heterogeneity was observed across included studies. Conclusions Our findings suggest that prasugrel and ticagrelor are more effective than clopidogrel on prevention of ST among patients underwent PCI. Simultaneously, there is no significant difference in the prevention of ST between prasugrel and ticagrelor.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here