Open AccessTime‐trends and treatment gaps in the antithrombotic management of patients with atrial fibrillation after percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from the CHUM AF‐STENT Registry
Author(s) -
BoivinProulx LaurieAnne,
DeneaultMarchand Ariane,
Matteau Alexis,
Mansour Samer,
Gobeil François,
Camm John A.,
Fox Keith A. A.,
Potter Brian J.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
clinical cardiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.263
H-Index - 72
eISSN - 1932-8737
pISSN - 0160-9289
DOI - 10.1002/clc.23316
Subject(s) - medicine , percutaneous coronary intervention , conventional pci , atrial fibrillation , antithrombotic , cohort , context (archaeology) , guideline , cardiology , concomitant , regimen , myocardial infarction , paleontology , pathology , biology
Background The management of atrial fibrillation and flutter (AF) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has undergone a rapid recent evolution. In 2016, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) published expert recommendations to help guide clinicians in balancing bleeding and thrombotic risks in these patients. Hypothesis Antithrombotic regimen prescriptions for AF patients undergoing PCI evolved after the publication of the 2016 CCS AF guidelines. Methods A prospective cohort of AF patients undergoing PCI with placement of a coronary stent from a single tertiary academic center was analyzed for the recommended antithrombotic regimen at discharge. Prescribing behavior was compared between three time periods (Cohort A [2010‐2011]; Cohort B [2014‐2015]; Cohort C [2017]) using the χ 2 test. In addition, antithrombotic management in Cohorts B and C were compared to guideline‐recommended therapy. Results A total of 459 patients with AF undergoing PCI were identified. Clinical and procedural characteristics were similar between cohorts, with the exception of an increase in drug‐eluting stent (DES) use over time ( P < .01). Overall, the rate of oral anticoagulation (OAC) increased over time ( P < .01), associated with an increase in nonvitamin K OAC prescription ( P < .01) and a concomitant decrease in vitamin K antagonist prescription ( P < .01). Despite this, the overall rate of anticoagulation remains below what would be predicted with perfect guideline compliance (75% vs 94%, P < .01). Conclusion There has been a dramatic shift in clinical practice for AF patients requiring PCI, with increases in prescription of OAC even in the context of an increase in the use of DES. However, room for further practice optimization still exists.