z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Bifurcation: How Can We Outperform the Provisional Strategy?
Author(s) -
Ng Andrew KeiYan,
Jim ManHong
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
clinical cardiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.263
H-Index - 72
eISSN - 1932-8737
pISSN - 0160-9289
DOI - 10.1002/clc.22581
Subject(s) - medicine , percutaneous coronary intervention , restenosis , bifurcation , conventional pci , balloon , optical coherence tomography , intervention (counseling) , stent , randomized controlled trial , radiology , cardiology , surgery , myocardial infarction , physics , nonlinear system , quantum mechanics , psychiatry
In the era of drug‐eluting stents, the provisional stenting strategy has been established as the default strategy in percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation lesions. However, emerging evidence shows that, in selected situations, the complex strategy of stenting both vessels regardless could reduce side‐branch restenosis without penalty. In particular, the double kissing crush technique has been proven to outperform the provisional strategy and other complex strategies in randomized trials. In this review, we present the evidence comparing the 2 strategies and individual stenting techniques and discuss the roles of other optimization techniques such as final kissing balloon inflation, proximal optimization technique, intravascular ultrasonography, and optical coherence tomography. Finally, we suggest a practical approach for choosing the optimal strategy for intervention with coronary bifurcation lesions.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here