Open AccessEfficacy and Safety of Unfractionated Heparin Plus Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors During Revascularization for an Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Trials Performed With Stents and Thienopyridines
Author(s) -
Winchester David E.,
Brearley William D.,
Wen Xuerong,
Park Ki E.,
Bavry Anthony A.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
clinical cardiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.263
H-Index - 72
eISSN - 1932-8737
pISSN - 0160-9289
DOI - 10.1002/clc.20974
Subject(s) - medicine , percutaneous coronary intervention , acute coronary syndrome , myocardial infarction , relative risk , heparin , revascularization , randomized controlled trial , cardiology , surgery , confidence interval
Abstract Background: Early studies of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPIs) demonstrated benefit during percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Since their introduction, the magnitude of benefit of GPIs has become unclear. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that adding a GPI to unfractionated heparin in ACS patients treated with stents and thienopyridines is beneficial. Methods: We searched the MEDLINE, Cochrane, and clinicaltrials.gov databases for randomized clinical trials that studied the use of GPIs during ACS. We required that patients be randomly assigned to unfractionated heparin plus a GPI versus unfractionated heparin plus placebo (or control). Additional inclusion criteria included the use of coronary stents and periprocedural thienopyridines. Outcomes were assessed at 30 days. Random effects DerSimonian‐Laird summary risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were constructed. Results: Sixteen studies with 7611 patients were included. Myocardial infarction was 3.1% with GPI versus 4.4% with control (RR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.59–0.94, P = 0.014); revascularization, 1.7% versus 2.7% (RR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.46–0.89, P = 0.008); major bleeding, 2.5% versus 2.1% (RR = 1.21; 95% CI, 0.89–1.63, P = 0.22); minor bleeding, 5.5% versus 4.1% (RR = 1.37; 95% CI, 1.06–1.78, P = 0.016); and mortality, 2.2% versus 2.9% (RR = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.59–1.06, P = 0.12), respectively. Conclusions: Among ACS patients treated with stents and thienopyridines, GPIs were associated with reduced myocardial infarction and revascularization. Minor, but not major bleeding was increased with GPIs. Mortality was similar between the groups. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Supporting information may be found in the online version of this article This work was supported by an unrestricted grant from the Florida Heart Research Institute, which had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, or interpretation, manuscript writing, or decision to proceed with publication. Anthony A Bavry has received research support from Novartis Pharmaceuticals and serves as a contractor for American College of Cardiology Cardiosource. The other authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.