
Clinical Implications of Thrombocytopenia Among Patients Undergoing Intra‐aortic Balloon Pump Counterpulsation in the Coronary Care Unit
Author(s) -
Roy Sion K.,
Howard Edward W.,
Panza Julio A.,
Cooper Howard A.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
clinical cardiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.263
H-Index - 72
eISSN - 1932-8737
pISSN - 0160-9289
DOI - 10.1002/clc.20694
Subject(s) - medicine , cardiogenic shock , incidence (geometry) , odds ratio , intensive care unit , confidence interval , coronary care unit , cardiology , heparin induced thrombocytopenia , confounding , heparin , myocardial infarction , physics , optics
Background Thrombocytopenia Hypothesis: intra‐aortic balloon pump (IABP)‐associated thrombocytopenia is not associated with an increased risk of major bleeding or in‐hospital death. Thrombocytopenia is a common adverse effect of the IABP. However, the clinical implications of IABP‐associated thrombocytopenia are unknown. Methods We assessed the incidence and predictors of thrombocytopenia, and the association between thrombocytopenia and relevant clinical end points, using prospectively collected data on 252 consecutive patients undergoing IABP in a single coronary care unit (CCU). Results Anticoagulation with intravenous heparin was administered to 182 patients (72%). Baseline platelet counts were 232 000 ± 96 000 mL, decreased to 154 000 ± 74 000 mL at day 3, and recovered to baseline by day 8. Thrombocytopenia (nadir < 150 000 mL or > 50% reduction from baseline) occurred in 109 patients (43%), with a similar incidence among patients who received heparin and those who did not (45% vs 40%, P = 0.5). Independent predictors of thrombocytopenia were lower body weight, cardiogenic shock, and duration of IABP support. The incidence of both major bleeding and in‐hospital death were higher among patients who developed thrombocytopenia than among those who did not (13.8% vs 4.2%, P = 0.01 and 28% vs 16%, P = 0.02, respectively). However, after controlling for confounding variables, thrombocytopenia was not an independent predictor of either major bleeding (odds ratio [OR]: 2.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.8–6.4, P = 0.1) or in‐hospital death (OR: 1.5, 95% CI: 0.8–2.9, P = 0.3). Conclusions Among patients undergoing IABP in the CCU, thrombocytopenia is generally mild, appears to be unrelated to concomitant heparin use, and is not associated with an increased risk of major bleeding or in‐hospital death. Copyright © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.