Open AccessThe Importance of Gamma‐Glutamyltransferase Activity in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease
Author(s) -
Demircan Sabri,
Yazici Mustafa,
Durna Kenan,
Kilicaslan Fethi,
Demir Serdar,
Pinar Mesut,
Gulel Okan
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
clinical cardiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.263
H-Index - 72
eISSN - 1932-8737
pISSN - 0160-9289
DOI - 10.1002/clc.20345
Subject(s) - medicine , ejection fraction , coronary artery disease , odds ratio , confidence interval , cardiology , gamma glutamyltransferase , coronary angiography , gastroenterology , myocardial infarction , heart failure , biochemistry , chemistry , enzyme
Background In this study, we sought to investigate the relation of gamma‐glutamyltransferase (GGT) levels with the significance of coronary artery disease (CAD), clinical presentation, left ventricular (LV) function, and inflammatory activity. Methods A total of 235 patients (mean age: 60.1 ± 10.5 years, 166 [70%] males) who had coronary angiography were included in the study. Patients who had CAD constituted the study group (Group 1, n=189) and patients who had insignificant coronary disease or normal coronary activity constituted the control group (Group 2, n=46). Results GGT levels were higher in Group 1 than Group 2 (38.7 ± 30.9 U/L versus 27.5 ± 17.5 U/L, p =0.025). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was lower in Group 1 than Group 2 (52.6% ± 11.7% versus 58.8% ± 11.3%, p < 0.002). GGT activity (40.2 ± 32.5 U/L versus 29.1 ± 18.3 U/L, p < 0.002) and c‐reactive protein (CRP) levels (33.9 ± 43.6 mg/dl versus 17.8 ± 29.8 mg/dl, p < 0.002) were higher, LVEF (52.6% ± 12.1% versus 56.5% ± 11.0%, p =0.021) was lower in patients with acute coronary syndrome compared with stable CAD group. In regression analysis, CRP levels ( p < 0.0001, odds ratio [OR]=3.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.10 < OR < 0.32), LVEF ( p =0.016, OR=− 2.44, 95% CI − 0.95 < OR < − 0.10) and LV end‐diastolic pressure ( p =0.015, OR=4.31, 95% CI − 1.19 < OR < − 0.13) were independent predictors of GGT activity. Conclusions The increased GGT activity is related to LV function, clinical stability, and inflammatory activity rather than the severity of CAD. Measurement of GGT activity may be useful in predicting cardiovascular risk. Copyright © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.