z-logo
Premium
A comparison of the energy and product distribution from biomass gasifiers
Author(s) -
Esplin G. J.,
Fung D. P. C.,
Hsu C. C.
Publication year - 1986
Publication title -
the canadian journal of chemical engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.404
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1939-019X
pISSN - 0008-4034
DOI - 10.1002/cjce.5450640417
Subject(s) - wood gas generator , fluidized bed , environmental science , biomass (ecology) , waste management , raw material , process engineering , engineering , coal , chemistry , oceanography , geology , organic chemistry
A detailed analyses of the raw producer gas streams generated by a downdraft gasifier and by a fluidized‐bed gasifier are presented and are discussed in terms of raw gas clean‐up considerations and of energy conversion efficiency. The major gasifier operating parameters such as fuel/air ratio, carbon conversion efficiency, net energy conversion efficiency, and producer gas heating value are then compared between seven operational gasifiers and a computer simulation model of a fluidized‐bed gasifier developed by Queen's University. It is concluded that the Queen's University model correctly predicts that the fuel/air ratio is the single most important parameter for determining gasifier performance. Downdraft gasifiers exhibit superior energy conversion efficiency and producer gas quality because they utilize a higher fuel/air ratio than do fluidized bed gasifiers.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom