z-logo
Premium
A comparison between CO 2 gasification of various biomass chars and coal char
Author(s) -
Hu Yuyan,
Yu Hangqin,
Zhou Fanglei,
Chen Dezhen
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
the canadian journal of chemical engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.404
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1939-019X
pISSN - 0008-4034
DOI - 10.1002/cjce.23417
Subject(s) - char , pyrolysis , coal , syngas , biomass (ecology) , thermogravimetric analysis , waste management , yield (engineering) , sewage sludge , chemical engineering , chemistry , pulp and paper industry , materials science , organic chemistry , metallurgy , catalysis , geology , sewage treatment , oceanography , engineering
In this paper, municipal solid waste (MSW), sewage sludge (SS), and rice straw (RS) were pyrolyzed under N 2 atmosphere and at 550 and 600 °C, and then the produced biochars were used for gasification in a CO 2 atmosphere. The effects of pyrolysis temperature, gasification temperature, and CO 2 /C ratio on the product composition and yield were studied. The results were compared with those from coal char gasification. The CO 2 gasification kinetics were determined under CO 2 flow by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). CO concentration in the syngas of the gasification experiments can be organized in the following order: MSW char > RS char > SS char > coal char. Considering the energy consumption and CO yield, the recommended gasification temperature for the biomass chars is 900 °C. The activation energies of CO 2 gasification calculated from the TGA data based on the most fitted reaction models can be organized in the following order: coal char > RS char > SS char > MSW char, which is consistent with the experimental results. For higher syngas field and lower CO 2 /C ratio, MSW char is recommended as the best feedstock for in the combined pyrolysis‐gasification process.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here