z-logo
Premium
Three different periods of CO 2 dissolution into a light crude oil
Author(s) -
Du Fengshuang,
Ma Hongze,
Gu Yongan
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
the canadian journal of chemical engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.404
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1939-019X
pISSN - 0008-4034
DOI - 10.1002/cjce.23204
Subject(s) - light crude oil , dissolution , crude oil , thermal diffusivity , chemistry , diffusion , analytical chemistry (journal) , mass transfer , thermodynamics , mineralogy , chromatography , petroleum engineering , geology , organic chemistry , physics
In this paper, phase behaviours and mass‐transfer mechanisms of a Bakken light crude oil‐CO 2 system are studied. A series of PVT tests of the light crude oil‐CO 2 system are conducted to measure CO 2 solubilities, oil‐swelling factors, and CO 2 ‐saturated oil densities at different equilibrium pressures and the actual reservoir temperature of T res  = 56.0 °C. Five CO 2 diffusion tests in the light crude oil are performed at five different initial test pressures ( P i  = 4.1, 5.2, 6.3, 7.7, and 9.0 MPa) and T res  = 56.0 °C by applying the pressure decay method (PDM). The graphical method (GM) is used to analyze the measured test pressure versus time data of each diffusion test and determine CO 2 average diffusivity in the light crude oil. It is found that the so‐called density‐driven natural convection can occur in the CO 2 ‐saturated light crude oil as its measured density is much higher than that of the dead light crude oil. Three distinct periods of CO 2 dissolution into the light crude oil are identified: the natural convection‐dominated period (I), the transition period, and the molecular diffusion‐dominated period (II). The determined CO 2 effective diffusivities ( D eff ) in Period I and CO 2 molecular diffusivities ( D ) in Period II from the GM are in the ranges of 0.28–1.75 × 10 −6  m 2 /s and 0.87–1.94 × 10 −9  m 2 /s at the initial test pressures of P i  = 4.1–9.0 MPa, respectively. Finally, it is also found that the constant Z ‐factor approximation used in the GM may cause a relatively large error in the determination of D eff or D .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom