Premium
Performance evaluation of fixed‐bed, millistructured, and metallic foam reactor channels for CO 2 methanation
Author(s) -
Bengaouer Alain,
Ducamp Julien,
Champon Isabelle,
Try Rasmey
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
the canadian journal of chemical engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.404
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1939-019X
pISSN - 0008-4034
DOI - 10.1002/cjce.23140
Subject(s) - methanation , materials science , substitute natural gas , power to gas , methane , space velocity , chemical engineering , hydrogen , catalysis , process engineering , waste management , electrolysis , syngas , chemistry , engineering , organic chemistry , electrode , electrolyte , selectivity
Power‐to‐gas technologies, combining hydrogen produced by water electrolysis with carbon dioxide to produce substitute natural gas (SNG), can support the increased penetration of renewable electricity sources. However, the technical and economic feasibility of these technologies requires the conversion efficiency of the whole process, including the methanation step. This paper provides an experimental performance comparison of three catalytic methanation reactor concepts, a fixed‐bed reactor, a millistructured reactor, and a metallic foam reactor with the same nickel‐alumina catalyst. The response of each reactor was analyzed in light of five performance criteria, representing the methane yield, the reactor compactness, and the maximum temperature elevation. The millistructured reactor channel showed a higher methane space‐time yield and volumetric productivity than the other reactors, but a significant catalyst temperature elevation. The metallic foam reactor showed a much lower space‐time yield and volumetric productivity, but very good thermal management.