z-logo
Premium
Ethanol production from sweet potato: The effect of ripening, comparison of two heating methods, and cost analysis
Author(s) -
Schweinberger Cristiane Martins,
Putti Tobias Romanzini,
Susin Gabriela Baldin,
Trierweiler Jorge Otávio,
Trierweiler Luciane Ferreira
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
the canadian journal of chemical engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.404
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1939-019X
pISSN - 0008-4034
DOI - 10.1002/cjce.22441
Subject(s) - context (archaeology) , renewable energy , biomass (ecology) , production (economics) , ripening , efficient energy use , production cost , work (physics) , agricultural engineering , environmental science , pulp and paper industry , process engineering , economics , food science , chemistry , engineering , agronomy , microeconomics , biology , mechanical engineering , paleontology , electrical engineering
Currently, biomass contributes to ∼14 % of global energy needs. Therefore, many studies and policies have been developed in order to expand the participation of renewable energy in the global energy matrix. In this context, ethanol has received substantial interest. This work investigates ways to improve efficiency in ethanol production from sweet potatoes, considering the costs that make the process potentially implementable. The following aspects were investigated: (i) conversion efficiency according to the post‐harvest time; (ii) influence of the heating method (water bath (conventional) and microwave) as well as the corresponding processing costs. The conversion efficiency increased significantly during sweet potato ripening, where the highest value was achieved 25 days after harvest. This is a very important result since it has a strong impact on the final cost. Among the heating methods, the conventional one was slightly superior in terms of conversion efficiency (9 % higher at 25 days) and also had better results regarding cost analysis. Among four designed scenarios, the largest cost difference was 17.5 %. Instead of a definitive elimination of microwave heating, the results should be analyzed to identify where the microwave heating should be improved in order to make it more attractive in the future.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here