Premium
The effects of differences in explanations, employee attributions, type of infraction, and discipline severity on perceived fairness of employee discipline
Author(s) -
Cole Nina D.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
canadian journal of administrative sciences / revue canadienne des sciences de l'administration
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.347
H-Index - 48
eISSN - 1936-4490
pISSN - 0825-0383
DOI - 10.1002/cjas.57
Subject(s) - attribution , psychology , social psychology , discipline , perception , interpersonal communication , distributive justice , economic justice , interactional justice , organizational justice , sociology , political science , neuroscience , law , social science , organizational commitment
Participants reported perceptions of fairness after reading 1 of 72 scenarios describing a disciplinary discussion between a manager and an employee (crossing four different disciplinary infractions, with three types of explanations for each infraction, three different levels of discipline severity, and two types of employee attributions for their behaviour). Results indicate that type of attribution, type of infraction, and level of discipline severity all have significant effects on perceptions of distributive, procedural, interpersonal, and informational justice. Type of explanation also has significant effects on perceptions of justice other than informational justice. It appears that managing disciplinary fairness may require a contingency approach. Copyright © 2008 ASAC. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.