z-logo
Premium
Effects from hydrogen bonding and rigidity on selectivity in tartaric acid‐based chiral selectors for enantioselective liquid chromatography
Author(s) -
Oxelbark Joakim,
Sellén IngaBritt
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
chirality
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.43
H-Index - 77
eISSN - 1520-636X
pISSN - 0899-0042
DOI - 10.1002/chir.10299
Subject(s) - chemistry , enantioselective synthesis , tartaric acid , selectivity , hydrogen bond , amide , chromatography , sorbent , high performance liquid chromatography , enantiomer , chiral column chromatography , organic chemistry , adsorption , molecule , catalysis , citric acid
Tartaric acid‐based selectors 1 (( R,R )‐O,O′‐Bis(dimethylbenzoyl)‐N,N′‐diallyl‐N,N′‐dimethyl tartaramide) and 2 (( R,R )‐N‐allyl‐O,O′‐bis(dimethylbenzoyl) tartarimide) were synthesized, immobilized on silica, and evaluated as chiral stationary phases in enantioselective chromatography. Comparison with the commercially available column Kromasil‐CHI‐1, based on selector 3 (( R,R )‐O,O′‐Bis(dimethylbenzoyl)‐N,N′‐diallyl tartaramide) resulted in the conclusion that amide NH functions are essential to chiral recognition on this sorbent. Furthermore, NH functions contribute significantly to retention of analytes except for alcohols. It was also found that flexibility of the benzoyl moieties is essential to selectivity. Chirality 15:787–793, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here