z-logo
Premium
Versatile Reaction Pathways of 1,1,3,3,3‐Pentafluoropropene at Rh(I) Complexes [Rh(E)(PEt 3 ) 3 ] (E=H, GePh 3 , Si(OEt) 3 , F, Cl): C‐F versus C‐H Bond Activation Steps
Author(s) -
Talavera Maria,
Braun Thomas
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
chemistry – a european journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.687
H-Index - 242
eISSN - 1521-3765
pISSN - 0947-6539
DOI - 10.1002/chem.202101508
Subject(s) - rhodium , chemistry , reactivity (psychology) , ligand (biochemistry) , yield (engineering) , medicinal chemistry , derivatization , catalysis , stereochemistry , materials science , organic chemistry , high performance liquid chromatography , medicine , biochemistry , alternative medicine , receptor , pathology , metallurgy
The reaction of the rhodium(I) complexes [Rh(E)(PEt 3 ) 3 ] (E=GePh 3 ( 1 ), H ( 6 ), F ( 7 )) with 1,1,3,3,3‐pentafluoropropene afforded the defluorinative germylation products Z/E ‐2‐(triphenylgermyl)‐1,3,3,3‐tetrafluoropropene and the fluorido complex [Rh(F)(CF 3 CHCF 2 )(PEt 3 ) 2 ] ( 2 ) together with the fluorophosphorane E ‐(CF 3 )CH=CF(PFEt 3 ). For [Rh(Si(OEt) 3 )(PEt 3 ) 3 ] ( 4 ) the coordination of the fluoroolefin was found to give [Rh{Si(OEt) 3 }(CF 3 CHCF 2 )(PEt 3 ) 2 ] ( 5 ). Two equivalents of complex 2 reacted further by C−F bond oxidative addition to yield [Rh(CF=CHCF 3 )(PEt 3 ) 2 ( μ ‐F) 3 Rh(CF 3 CHCF 2 )(PEt 3 )] ( 9 ). The role of the fluorido ligand on the reactivity of complex 2 was assessed by comparison with the analogous chlorido complex. The use of complexes 1 , 4 and 6 as catalysts for the derivatization of 1,1,3,3,3‐pentafluoropropene provided products, which were generated by hydrodefluorination, hydrometallation and germylation reactions.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here