z-logo
Premium
Surface‐Dependent Activation of Model α‐Al 2 O 3 ‐Supported P‐Doped Hydrotreating Catalysts Prepared by Spin Coating
Author(s) -
Garcia de Castro Ricardo,
Bertrand Jérémy,
Rigaud Baptiste,
Devers Elodie,
Digne Mathieu,
LamicHumblot AnneFélicie,
Pirngruber Gerhard,
Carrier Xavier
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
chemistry – a european journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.687
H-Index - 242
eISSN - 1521-3765
pISSN - 0947-6539
DOI - 10.1002/chem.202001882
Subject(s) - hydrodesulfurization , catalysis , sulfidation , sulfide , dispersion (optics) , x ray photoelectron spectroscopy , heteroatom , chemistry , phosphate , chemical engineering , coating , crystal (programming language) , heterogeneous catalysis , inorganic chemistry , materials science , organic chemistry , ring (chemistry) , physics , optics , engineering , computer science , programming language
Requirements for improved catalytic formulations is continuously driving research in hydrotreating (HDT) catalysis for biomass upgrading and heteroatom removal for cleaner fuels. The present work proposes a surface‐science approach for the understanding of the genesis of the active (sulfide) phase in model P‐doped MoS 2 hydrotreating catalysts supported on α‐Al 2 O 3 single crystals. This approach allows one to obtain a surface‐dependent insight by varying the crystal orientations of the support. Model phosphorus‐doped catalysts are prepared via spin‐coating of Mo–P precursor solutions onto four α‐Al 2 O 3 crystal orientations, C(0001), A(11 2 ‾ 0), M(10 1 ‾ 0) and R(1 1 ‾ 02) that exhibit different speciations of surface ‐OH. 31 P and 95 Mo liquid‐state NMR are used to give a comprehensive description of the Mo and P speciation of the phospho‐molybdic precursor solution. The speciation of the deposition solution is then correlated with the genesis of the active MoS 2 phase. XPS quantification of the surface P/Mo ratio reveal a surface‐dependent phosphate aggregation driven by the amount of free phosphates in solution. Phosphates aggregation decreases in the following order C(0001)≫M(10 1 ‾ 0)>A(11 2 ‾ 0), R(1 1 ‾ 02). This evolution can be rationalized by an increasing strength of phosphate/surface interactions on the different α‐Al 2 O 3 surface orientations from the C(0001) to the R(1 1 ‾ 02) plane. Retardation of the sulfidation with temperature is observed for model catalysts with the highest phosphate dispersion on the surface (A(11 2 ‾ 0), R(1 1 ‾ 02)), suggesting that phosphorus strongly intervene in the genesis of the active phase through a close intimacy between phosphates and molybdates. The surface P/Mo ratio appears as a key descriptor to quantify this retarding effect. It is proposed that retardation of sulfidation is driven by two effects: i) a chemical inhibition through formation of hardly reducible mixed molybdo‐phosphate structures and ii) a physical inhibition with phosphate clusters inhibiting the growth of MoS 2 . The surface‐dependent phosphorus doping on model α‐Al 2 O 3 supports can be used as a guide for the rational design of more efficient HDT catalysts on industrial γ‐Al 2 O 3 carrier.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom