Premium
Behavior of Highly Diluted Electrolytes in Strong Electric Fields—Prevention of Alumina Deposition on Grading Electrodes in HVDC Transmission Modules by CO 2 ‐induced pH‐Control
Author(s) -
Weber Immo,
Mallick Bert,
Schild Matthias,
Kareth Sabine,
Puchta Ralph,
van Eldik Rudi
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
chemistry – a european journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.687
H-Index - 242
eISSN - 1521-3765
pISSN - 0947-6539
DOI - 10.1002/chem.201400165
Subject(s) - electrolyte , aqueous solution , deposition (geology) , electrode , aluminium , platinum , chemistry , analytical chemistry (journal) , materials science , inorganic chemistry , metallurgy , catalysis , environmental chemistry , paleontology , biochemistry , sediment , biology
Alumina deposition on platinum grading electrodes in high voltage direct current (HVDC) transmission modules is an unsolved problem that has been around for more than three decades. This is due to the unavoidable corrosion of aluminum heat sinks that causes severe damage to electrical power plants and losses in the range of a million Euro range per day in power outage. Simple experiments in a representative HV test setup showed that aluminates at concentrations even below 10 −8 mol L −1 can deposit on anodes through neutralization by protons produced in de‐ionized water ( κ ≤0.15 μS cm −1 ) at 20–35 kV (8 mA) per electrode. In this otherwise electrolyte‐poor aqueous environment, the depositions are formed three orders of magnitude below the critical precipitation concentration at pH 7! In the presence of an inert electrolyte such as TMAT (tetramethylammonium‐ p ‐toluenesulfonate), at a concentration level just above that of the total dissolved aluminum, no deposition was observed. Deposition can be also prevented by doping with CO 2 gas at a concentration level that is magnitudes lower than that of the dissolved aluminum. From an overview of aqueous aluminum chemistry, the mystery of the alumina deposition process and its inhibition by CO 2 is experimentally resolved and fully explained by field accumulation and repulsion models in synergism with acid–base equilibria. The extraordinary size of the alumina depositions is accounted for in terms of proton tunneling through “hydrated” alumina, which is supported by quantum chemical calculations. As a consequence, pulse‐purging with pure CO 2 gas is presented as a technical solution to prevent the deposition of alumina.