z-logo
Premium
Cyclodimerization versus Polymerization of Methyl Methacrylate Induced by N ‐Heterocyclic Carbenes: A Combined Experimental and Theoretical Study
Author(s) -
Nzahou Ottou Winnie,
Bourichon Damien,
Vignolle Joan,
Wirotius AnneLaure,
Robert Fredéric,
Landais Yannick,
Sotiropoulos JeanMarc,
Miqueu Karinne,
Taton Daniel
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
chemistry – a european journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.687
H-Index - 242
eISSN - 1521-3765
pISSN - 0947-6539
DOI - 10.1002/chem.201304492
Subject(s) - chemistry , nucleophile , methyl methacrylate , adduct , polymerization , medicinal chemistry , toluene , molecule , polymer chemistry , photochemistry , catalysis , organic chemistry , polymer
The activation behavior of two N ‐heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs), namely, 1,3‐bis(isopropyl)imidazol‐2‐ylidene(NHC i Pr) and 1,3‐bis( tert‐ butyl) imidazol‐2‐ylidene (NHC t Bu), as organic nucleophiles in the reaction with methyl methacrylate (MMA) is described. NHC t Bu allows the polymerization of MMA in DMF at room temperature and in toluene at 50 °C, whereas NHC i Pr reacts with two molecules of MMA, forming an unprecedented imidazolium–enolate cyclodimer (NHC i Pr/MMA=1:2). It is proposed that the reaction mechanism occurs by initial 1,4‐nucleophilic addition of NHC i Pr to MMA, generating a zwitterionic enolate 2 , followed by addition of 2 to a second MMA molecule, forming a linear imidazolium–enolate 3 (NHC i Pr/MMA=1:2). Proton transfer, generating intermediate 5 , followed by cyclization and release of methanol yielded the aforementioned zwitterionic cyclodimer 1:2 adduct 7 , the molecular structure of which has been established by NMR spectroscopy, X‐ray diffraction, and mass spectrometry. This unexpected difference between NHC t Bu and NHC i Pr in the reaction with MMA (polymerization and cyclodimerization, respectively) can be rationalized by using DFT calculations. In particular, the nature of the NHC strongly influences the cyclodimerization pathway, the cyclization of 5 and the release of methanol are the discriminating step and limiting step, respectively. In the case of NHC t Bu, both steps are strongly disfavoured compared with that of NHC i Pr (energetic difference of around 14 and 9 kcal mol −1 , respectively), preventing the cyclization mechanism from a kinetic viewpoint. Moreover, addition of a third molecule of MMA in the polymerization pathway results in a lower activation barrier than that of the limiting step in the cyclodimerization pathway (difference of around 14 kcal mol −1 ), in agreement with the formation of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) by using NHC t Bu as nucleophile.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom