Premium
Influential Role of Ethereal Solvent on Organolithium Compounds: The Case of Carboranyllithium
Author(s) -
Popescu AdrianRadu,
Musteti Ana Daniela,
FerrerUgalde Albert,
Viñas Clara,
Núñez Rosario,
Teixidor Francesc
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
chemistry – a european journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.687
H-Index - 242
eISSN - 1521-3765
pISSN - 0947-6539
DOI - 10.1002/chem.201102626
Subject(s) - dilithium , chemistry , solvent , tetrahydrofuran , carborane , diethyl ether , ion , covalent bond , solvophobic , ether , medicinal chemistry , polymer chemistry , organic chemistry , deprotonation
The influence of ethereal solvents (diethyl ether (Et 2 O), tetrahydrofuran (THF) or dimethoxyethane (DME)) on the formation of organolithiated compounds has been studied on the 1,2‐C 2 B 10 H 12 platform. This platform is very attractive because it contains two C c H adjacent units ready to be lithiated. On would expect that the closeness of both C c H units would induce a higher resistance of the second C c H unit being lithiated following the first lithiation. However, this is not the case, which makes 1,2‐C 2 B 10 H 12 attractive to get a better understanding of the ethereal solvent influence on the lithiation process. The formation of carboranyl disubstituted species has been attributed to the existence of an equilibrium in which the carboranyl monolithiated species disproportionates into dilithium carborane and pristine carborane. The way Li + binds to C c in the carboranyl fragment and how the solvent stabilizes such a binding is paramount to drive the reaction to the generation of mono‐ and disubstituted carboranes. In fact, the proportion of mono‐ and disubstituted species is a consequence of the formation of contact ion pairs and, to a lesser extent, of separated ion pairs in ethereal solvents. All ethereal solvents generate contact ion pairs in which a large degree of covalent C c Li(solvent) bonding can be assumed, according to experimental and theoretical data. Furthermore, Et 2 O tends to produce carboranyllitium ion pairs with a higher degree of contact ion pairs than THF or DME. It has been determined that for a high‐yield preparation of monosubstituted 1‐R‐1,2‐C 2 B 10 H 11 , in C c R (R=C, S or P) coupling reactions, the reagent type defines which is the most appropriate ethereal solvent. In reactions in which a halide is generated, as with ClPPh 2 or BrCH 2 CHCH 2 , Et 2 O appears to produce the highest degree of monosubstitution. In other situations, such as with S 8 , or when no halide is generated, THF or DME facilitate the largest degree of monosubstitution. It has been shown that upon the self reaction of Li[1,2‐C 2 B 10 H 11 ] to produce [LiC 4 B 20 H 22 ] − the nucleophilicity of the carboranyllithium can even be further enhanced, beyond the ethereal solvent, by synergism with halide salts. The mediation of Li + in producing isomerizations on allyl substituents has also been demonstrated, as Et 2 O does not tend to induce isomerization, whereas THF or DME produces the propenyl isomer. The results presented here most probably can be extended to other molecular types to interpret the Li + mediation in CC or other CX coupling reactions.