Premium
[{Au(IPr)} 2 (μ‐OH)]X Complexes: Synthetic, Structural and Catalytic Studies
Author(s) -
Ramón Rubén S.,
Gaillard Sylvain,
Poater Albert,
Cavallo Luigi,
Slawin Alexandra M. Z.,
Nolan Steven P.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
chemistry – a european journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.687
H-Index - 242
eISSN - 1521-3765
pISSN - 0947-6539
DOI - 10.1002/chem.201002607
Subject(s) - trifluoromethanesulfonate , chemistry , catalysis , nitrile , reactivity (psychology) , aryl , alkyl , medicinal chemistry , hydroxide , ligand (biochemistry) , aqueous solution , organic chemistry , medicine , biochemistry , alternative medicine , receptor , pathology
The synthesis of a series of dinuclear gold hydroxide complexes has been achieved. These complexes of type [{Au(IPr)} 2 (μ‐OH)]X (X=BF 4 , NTf 2 , OTf, FABA, SbF 6 ; IPr=2,6‐bis(disopropylphenyl)imidazol‐2‐ylidene; NTf 2 =bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imidate; OTf=trifluoromethanesulfonate; FABA=tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)borate) are easily formed in the presence of water and prove highly efficient in the catalytic hydration of nitriles. Their facile formation in aqueous media suggests they are of relevance in gold‐catalyzed reactions involving water. Additionally, a series of [Au(IPr)(NCR)][BF 4 ] (R=alkyl, aryl) complexes was synthesized as they possibly occur as intermediates in the catalytic reaction mechanism. 1 H and 13 C NMR data as well as key bond lengths obtained by X‐ray diffraction studies are compared and reveal an interesting structure–activity relationship. The collected data indicate a negligible effect of the nature of the nitrile on the reactivity of [Au(L)(NCR)][X] complexes in catalysis.