Ketone–Alcohol Hydrogen‐Transfer Equilibria: Is the Biooxidation of Halohydrins Blocked?

To ensure the quasi‐irreversibility of the oxidation of alcohols coupled with the reduction of ketones in a hydrogen‐transfer (HT) fashion, stoichiometric amounts of α‐halo carbonyl compounds have been employed as hydrogen acceptors. The reason that these substrates lead to quasi‐quantitative conversions has been tacitly attributed to both thermodynamic and kinetic effects. To provide a clear rationale for this behavior, we investigate herein the redox equilibrium of a selected series of ketones and 2‐propanol by undertaking a study that combines experimental and theoretical approaches. First, the activity of the ( R )‐specific alcohol dehydrogenase from Lactobacillus brevis (LBADH) with these substrates was studied. The docking of acetophenone/( R )‐1‐phenyethanol and α‐chloroacetophenone/( S )‐2‐chloro‐1‐phenylethanol in the active site of the enzyme confirms that there seems to be no structural reason for the lack of reactivity of halohydrins. This assumption is confirmed by the fact that the corresponding aluminum‐catalyzed Meerwein–Ponndorf–Verley–Oppenauer (MPVO) reactions afford similar conversions to those obtained with LBADH, showing that the observed reactivity is independent of the catalyst employed. While the initial rates of the enzymatic reductions and the IR ν (CO) values contradict the general belief that electron‐withdrawing groups increase the electrophilicity of the carbonyl group, the calculated Δ G values of the isodesmic redox transformations of these series of ketones/alcohols with 2‐propanol/acetone support the thermodynamic control of the reaction. As a result, a general method to predict the degree of conversion obtained in the HT‐reduction process of a given ketone based on the IR absorption band of the carbonyl group is proposed, and a strategy to achieve the HT oxidation of halohydrins is also shown.