Indenyl Abstraction versus Alkyl Abstraction of [(Indenyl)ScR 2 (thf)] by [Ph 3 C] [B(C 6 F 5 ) 4 ]: Aspecific and Syndiospecific Styrene Polymerization | Zendy

Xu Xin | Zendy; Chen Yaofeng | Zendy; Sun Jie | Zendy

Premium

Indenyl Abstraction versus Alkyl Abstraction of [(Indenyl)ScR 2 (thf)] by [Ph 3 C] [B(C 6 F 5 ) 4 ]: Aspecific and Syndiospecific Styrene Polymerization

Author(s) -

Xu Xin,

Chen Yaofeng,

Sun Jie

Publication year - 2009

Publication title -

chemistry – a european journal

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 1.687

H-Index - 242

eISSN - 1521-3765

pISSN - 0947-6539

DOI - 10.1002/chem.200802220

Subject(s) - abstraction , alkyl , ligand (biochemistry) , chemistry , medicinal chemistry , stereochemistry , scheme (mathematics) , computer science , organic chemistry , mathematics , philosophy , biochemistry , receptor , epistemology , mathematical analysis

Controlled abstraction : [Ph 3 C][B(C 6 F 5 ) 4 ] is best known for its excellent ability to abstract alkyl ligands, however, the present study on mono(indenyl)–Sc–dialkyl/[Ph 3 C][B(C 6 F 5 ) 4 ] systems has found that [Ph 3 C][B(C 6 F 5 ) 4 ] can abstract a π‐bonded indenyl ligand rather than a σ‐alkyl ligand (see scheme). The abstraction pathway can be controlled by changing the substituents on the indenyl ligands.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research