z-logo
Premium
New Insights into the Polymerization of Methyl Methacrylate Initiated by Rare‐Earth Borohydride Complexes: A Combined Experimental and Computational Approach
Author(s) -
Barros Noémi,
Schappacher Michèle,
Dessuge Paul,
Maron Laurent,
Guillaume Sophie M.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
chemistry – a european journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.687
H-Index - 242
eISSN - 1521-3765
pISSN - 0947-6539
DOI - 10.1002/chem.200701438
Subject(s) - borohydride , chemistry , polymerization , methyl methacrylate , hydroboration , molar mass , medicinal chemistry , polymer chemistry , density functional theory , computational chemistry , catalysis , polymer , organic chemistry
Polymerization of methyl methacrylate (MMA) initiated by the rare‐earth borohydride complexes [Ln(BH 4 ) 3 (thf) 3 ] (Ln=Nd, Sm) or [Sm(BH 4 )(Cp*) 2 (thf)] (Cp*=η‐C 5 Me 5 ) proceeds at ambient temperature to give rather syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) with molar masses M̄ n higher than expected and quite broad molar mass distributions, which is consistent with a poor initiation efficiency. The polymerization of MMA was investigated by performing density functional theory (DFT) calculations on an η‐C 5 H 5 model metallocene and showed that in the reaction of [Eu(BH 4 )(Cp) 2 ] with MMA the borate [Eu(Cp) 2 {(OBH 3 )(OMe)CC(Me) 2 }] ( e‐2 ) complex, which forms via the enolate [Eu(Cp) 2 {O(OMe)CC(Me) 2 }] ( e ), is calculated to be exergonic and is the most likely of all of the possible products. This product is favored because the reaction that leads to the formation of carboxylate [Eu(Cp) 2 {OOCC(Me)(CH 2 )}] ( f ) is thermodynamically favorable, but kinetically disfavored, and both of the potential products from a Markovnikov [Eu(Cp) 2 {O(OMe)CCH(Me)(CH 2 BH 3 )}] ( g ) or anti‐Markovnikov [Eu(Cp) 2 {O(OMe)CC(Me 2 )(BH 3 )}] ( h ) hydroboration reaction are also kinetically inaccessible. Similar computational results were obtained for the reaction of [Eu(BH 4 ) 3 ] and MMA with all of the products showing extra stabilization. The DFT calculations performed by using [Eu(Cp) 2 (H)] to model the mechanism previously reported for the polymerization of MMA initiated by [Sm(Cp*) 2 (H)] 2 confirmed the favorable exergonic formation of the intermediate [Eu(Cp) 2 {O(OMe)CC(Me) 2 }] ( e′′ ) as the kinetic product, this enolate species ultimately leads to the formation of PMMA as experimentally observed. Replacing H by BH 4 thus prevents the 1,4‐addition of the [Eu(BH 4 )(Cp) 2 ] borohydride ligand to the first incoming MMA molecule and instead favors the formation of the borate complex e‐2 . This intermediate is the somewhat active species in the polymerization of MMA initiated by the borohydride precursors [Ln(BH 4 ) 3 (thf) 3 ] or [Sm(BH 4 )(Cp*) 2 (thf)].

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom