Premium
Direct versus Mediated Through‐Space Magnetic Interactions: A First Principles, Bottom‐Up Reinvestigation of the Magnetism of the Pyridyl‐Verdazyl:Hydroquinone Molecular Co‐Crystal
Author(s) -
Jornet Joaquim,
Deumal Mercè,
RibasAriño Jordi,
Bearpark Michael J.,
Robb Michael A.,
Hicks Robin G.,
Novoa Juan J.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
chemistry – a european journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.687
H-Index - 242
eISSN - 1521-3765
pISSN - 0947-6539
DOI - 10.1002/chem.200501182
Subject(s) - radical , stack (abstract data type) , magnetism , chemistry , hydroquinone , crystal (programming language) , space (punctuation) , crystallography , condensed matter physics , chemical physics , physics , organic chemistry , linguistics , philosophy , computer science , programming language
The mechanism of the magnetic interaction in the pyridyl‐verdazyl radical:hydroquinone (pyvd:hq) molecular co‐crystal is important as it has been suggested to originate by a unique “mediated through‐space” magnetic interaction. This interaction was proposed to magnetically connect two nonadjacent pyridyl‐verdazyl radicals within a π stack, where adjacent radicals pile up in a head‐over‐tail orientation. The connection is made through a third radical sitting between the previous two mediated radicals. Given the relevance of this proposal, we decided to reinvestigate the magnetic properties of this co‐crystal by using our recently proposed first‐principles “bottom‐up” procedure. Based on B3LYP/6‐31+G(d) and CASSCF(6,6)/6‐31+G(d) calculations (the results of which are identical to those provided by CASSCF(10,10)/6‐31+G(d) calculations), we have computed the microscopic J AB values for all direct through‐space magnetic interactions between nearby pyridyl‐verdazyl radicals. The magnetic interactions give rise to two dominant values of similar strength: −56 and −54 cm −1 at the B3LYP level, which are calculated as −38 and −31 cm −1 at the CASSCF(6,6) and CAS(10,10) levels (all other interactions being smaller than |1| cm −1 ). The dominant interactions correspond to the direct through‐space interaction between two adjacent radicals of a π stack. The crystal also exhibits a radical‐mediated through‐space interaction of −0.31 cm −1 between two nonadjacent radicals of a π stack. The direct through‐space magnetic interactions are two orders of magnitude larger than the mediated through‐space interaction. Thus, first‐principles calculations do not support a mediated through‐space mechanism to explain the magnetism of the pyvd:hq co‐crystal. The magnetic topology generated by the two dominant antiferromagnetic interactions in the pyvd:hq co‐crystal consists of one‐dimensional (1D) alternating chains (interacting very weakly along the b and c axes). By using this topology, the computed macroscopic magnetic susceptibility curve reproduces the experimental one properly. This first‐principles bottom‐up description of the magnetism in the pyvd:hq co‐crystal differs in some fundamental aspects from that previously proposed in the literature.