Premium
Solubilization of Single‐Walled Carbon Nanotubes by using Polycyclic Aromatic Ammonium Amphiphiles in Water—Strategy for the Design of High‐Performance Solubilizers
Author(s) -
Tomonari Yasuhiko,
Murakami Hiroto,
Nakashima Naotoshi
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
chemistry – a european journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.687
H-Index - 242
eISSN - 1521-3765
pISSN - 0947-6539
DOI - 10.1002/chem.200501176
Subject(s) - ammonium bromide , carbon nanotube , micelle , aqueous solution , chemistry , pyrene , bromide , solubility , amphiphile , sodium dodecyl sulfate , fluorescence , micellar solutions , solubilization , inorganic chemistry , organic chemistry , pulmonary surfactant , materials science , nanotechnology , copolymer , biochemistry , polymer , physics , quantum mechanics
We describe the design of polycyclic aromatic compounds with high performance that dissolve single‐walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs). Synthetic amphiphiles trimethyl‐(2‐oxo‐2‐phenylethyl)‐ammonium bromide ( 1 ) and trimethyl‐(2‐naphthalen‐2‐yl‐2‐oxo‐ethyl)‐ammonium bromide ( 2 ) carrying a phenyl or a naphtyl moiety were not able to dissolve/disperse SWNTs in water. By contrast, trimethyl‐(2‐oxo‐2‐phenanthren‐9‐yl‐ethyl)‐ammonium bromide ( 3 ) solubilized SWNTs, although the solubilization ability was lower than that of trimethyl‐(2‐oxo‐2‐pyrene‐1‐yl‐ethyl)‐ammonium bromide ( 4 ) (solubilization behavior observed by using 4 was described briefly in reference 4a). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), as well as visible/near‐IR, fluorescence, and near‐IR photoluminescence spectroscopies were employed to reveal the solubilization properties of 4 in water, and to compare these results with those obtained by using sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (HTAB) as solubilizers. Compound 4 solubilized both the as‐produced SWNTs (raw‐SWNTs) and purified SWNTs under mild experimental conditions, and the solubilization ability was better than that of SDS and HTAB. Near‐IR photoluminescence measurements revealed that the chiral indices of the SWNTs dissolved in an aqueous solution of 4 were quite different from those obtained by using micelles of SDS and HTAB; for a SWNTs/ 4 solution, the intensity of the (7,6), (9,5), and (12,1) indices were strong and the chirality distribution was narrower than those of the micellar solutions. This indicates that the aqueous solution of 4 has a tendency to dissolve semiconducting SWNTs with diameters in the range of 0.89–1.0 nm, which are larger than those SWNTs (0.76–0.97 nm) dissolved in the aqueous micelles of SDS and HTAB.