z-logo
Premium
Ligand Bite Governs Enantioselectivity: Electronic and Steric Control in Pd‐Catalyzed Allylic Alkylations by Modular Fenchyl Phosphinites (FENOPs)
Author(s) -
Goldfuss Bernd,
Löschmann Thomas,
Rominger Frank
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
chemistry – a european journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.687
H-Index - 242
eISSN - 1521-3765
pISSN - 0947-6539
DOI - 10.1002/chem.200400273
Subject(s) - chemistry , allylic rearrangement , steric effects , aryl , denticity , enantiomer , nucleophile , stereochemistry , ligand (biochemistry) , catalysis , electronic effect , enantioselective synthesis , medicinal chemistry , chelation , tsuji–trost reaction , organic chemistry , crystal structure , receptor , alkyl , biochemistry
Modular fenchyl phosphinites (FENOPs) containing different aryl units—phenyl ( 1 ), 2‐anisyl ( 2 ), or 2‐pyridyl ( 3 )—are efficiently accessible from (−)‐fenchone. For comparison of the influence of the different aryl units on enantioselectivities and reactivities, these FENOPs were employed in Pd‐catalyzed allylic alkylations. The strongly chelating character of P,N‐bidentate 3 is apparent from X‐ray structures with PdCl 2 ([Pd( 3 )Cl 2 ]), and with allyl–Pd units in ([Pd( 3 )(η 1 ‐allyl)] and [Pd( 3 )(η 3 ‐allyl)]). FENOP3 gives rise to a PdL* catalyst of moderate enantioselectivity (42 % ee , R product). Surprisingly, higher enantioselectivities are found for the hemilabile, monodentate FENOPs 1 (83 % ee , S enantiomer) and 2 (69 % ee , S enantiomer). Only small amounts of 1 or 2 generate selective PdL* catalysts, while complete abolition of enantioselectivity appears with unselective PdL* 2 species with higher FENOP concentrations in the cases of 1 or 2 . Computational transition structure analyses reveal steric and electronic origins of enantioselectivities. The nucleophile is electronically guided trans to phosphorus. endo ‐Allyl arrangements are favored over exo ‐allyl orientations for 1 and 2 due to Pd–π–pyridyl interactions with short “side‐on” Pd‐aryl interactions. More remote “edge‐on” Pd–π–aryl interactions in 3 with Pd‐N(lp) coordination favor endo ‐allyl units slightly more and explain the switch of enantioselectivity from 1 ( S ) and 2 ( S ) to 3 ( R ).

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom