z-logo
Premium
Fabrication of Nanofibers with Uniform Morphology by Self‐Assembly of Designed Peptides
Author(s) -
Matsumura Sachiko,
Uemura Shinobu,
Mihara Hisakazu
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
chemistry – a european journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.687
H-Index - 242
eISSN - 1521-3765
pISSN - 0947-6539
DOI - 10.1002/chem.200305735
Subject(s) - nanofiber , peptide , amphiphile , random coil , transmission electron microscopy , fabrication , self assembly , fiber , morphology (biology) , materials science , crystallography , residue (chemistry) , ribbon , nanotechnology , chemistry , biophysics , polymer , copolymer , circular dichroism , biochemistry , composite material , medicine , alternative medicine , biology , genetics , pathology
Fabrication of controlled peptide nanofibers with homogeneous morphology has been demonstrated. Amphiphilic β‐sheet peptides were designed as sequences of Pro‐Lys‐X 1 ‐Lys‐X 2 ‐X 2 ‐Glu‐X 1 ‐Glu‐Pro. X 1 and X 2 were hydrophobic residues selected from Phe, Ile, Val, or Tyr. The peptide FI (X 1 =Phe; X 2 =Ile) self‐assemble into straight fibers with 80–120 nm widths and clear edges, as examined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). The fiber formation is performed in a hierarchical manner: β‐sheet peptides form a protofibril, the protofibrils assemble side‐by‐side to form a ribbon, and the ribbons then coil in a left‐handed fashion to make up a straight fiber. These type of fibers are formed from peptides possessing hydrophobic aromatic Phe residue(s). Furthermore, a peptide with Ala residues at both N and C termini does not form fibers (100 nm scale) with clear edges; this causes random aggregation of small pieces of fibers instead. Thus, the combination of unique amphiphilic sequences and terminal Pro residues determine the fiber morphology.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here