Premium
Coordination Algorithms Control Molecular Architecture: [Cu I 4 (L2) 4 ] 4+ Grid Complex Versus [M II 2 (L2) 2 X 4 ] y+ Side‐By‐Side Complexes (M=Mn, Co, Ni, Zn; X=Solvent or Anion) and [Fe II (L2) 3 ][Cl 3 Fe III OFe III Cl 3 ]
Author(s) -
Lan Yanhua,
Kennepohl Dietmar K.,
Moubaraki Boujemaa,
Murray Keith S.,
Cashion John D.,
Jameson Geoffrey B.,
Brooker Sally
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
chemistry – a european journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.687
H-Index - 242
eISSN - 1521-3765
pISSN - 0947-6539
DOI - 10.1002/chem.200304915
Subject(s) - chemistry , ligand (biochemistry) , crystallography , metal , crystal structure , transition metal , stereochemistry , catalysis , biochemistry , receptor , organic chemistry
The synthesis and characterisation of a pyridazine‐containing two‐armed grid ligand L2 (prepared from one equivalent of 3,6‐diformylpyridazine and two equivalents of p ‐anisidine) and the resulting transition metal (Zn, Cu, Ni, Co, Fe, Mn) complexes ( 1 – 9 ) are reported. Single‐crystal X‐ray structure determinations revealed that the copper( I ) complex had self‐assembled as a [2×2] grid, [Cu I 4 (L2) 4 ][PF 6 ] 4 ⋅ (CH 3 CN)(H 2 O)(CH 3 CH 2 OCH 2 CH 3 ) 0.25 ( 2⋅ (CH 3 CN)(H 2 O)(CH 3 CH 2 OCH 2 CH 3 ) 0.25 ), whereas the [Zn 2 (L2) 2 (CH 3 CN) 2 (H 2 O) 2 ][ClO 4 ] 4 ⋅ CH 3 CN ( 1⋅ CH 3 CN), [Ni II 2 (L2) 2 (CH 3 CN) 4 ][BF 4 ] 4 ⋅ (CH 3 CH 2 OCH 2 CH 3 ) 0.25 ( 5 a⋅ (CH 3 CH 2 OCH 2 CH 3 ) 0.25 ) and [Co II 2 (L2) 2 (H 2 O) 2 (CH 3 CN) 2 ][ClO 4 ] 4 ⋅ (H 2 O)(CH 3 CN) 0.5 ( 6 a⋅ (H 2 O)(CH 3 CN) 0.5 ) complexes adopt a side‐by‐side architecture; iron( II ) forms a monometallic cation binding three L2 ligands, [Fe II (L2) 3 ][Fe III Cl 3 OCl 3 Fe III ] ⋅ CH 3 CN ( 7⋅ CH 3 CN). A more soluble salt of the cation of 7 , the diamagnetic complex [Fe II (L2) 3 ][BF 4 ] 2 ⋅ 2 H 2 O ( 8 ), was prepared, as well as two derivatives of 2 , [Cu I 2 (L2) 2 (NCS) 2 ] ⋅ H 2 O ( 3 ) and [Cu I 2 (L2)(NCS) 2 ] ( 4 ). The manganese complex, [Mn II 2 (L2) 2 Cl 4 ] ⋅ 3 H 2 O ( 9 ), was not structurally characterised, but is proposed to adopt a side‐by‐side architecture. Variable temperature magnetic susceptibility studies yielded small negative J values for the side‐by‐side complexes: J =−21.6 cm −1 and g =2.17 for S =1 dinickel( II ) complex [Ni II 2 (L2) 2 (H 2 O) 4 ][BF 4 ] 4 ( 5 b ) (fraction monomer 0.02); J =−7.6 cm −1 and g =2.44 for S = 3/2 dicobalt( II ) complex [Co II 2 (L2) 2 (H 2 O) 4 ][ClO 4 ] 4 ( 6 b ) (fraction monomer 0.02); J =−3.2 cm −1 and g =1.95 for S = 5/2 dimanganese( II ) complex 9 (fraction monomer 0.02). The double salt, mixed valent iron complex 7⋅ H 2 O gave J =−75 cm −1 and g =1.81 for the S = 5/2 diiron( III ) anion (fraction monomer=0.025). These parameters are lower than normal for Fe III OFe III species because of fitting of superimposed monomer and dimer susceptibilities arising from trace impurities. The iron( II ) centre in 7⋅ H 2 O is low spin and hence diamagnetic, a fact confirmed by the preparation and characterisation of the simple diamagnetic iron( II ) complex 8 . Mössbauer measurements at 77 K confirmed that there are two iron sites in 7⋅ H 2 O, a low‐spin iron( II ) site and a high‐spin diiron( III ) site. A full electrochemical investigation was undertaken for complexes 1, 2, 5 b, 6 b and 8 and this showed that multiple redox processes are a feature of all of them.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom