z-logo
Premium
Structural Principles of the Coordination Number Eight: WF   2− 8 , ReF   2− 8 , and XeF   2− 8
Author(s) -
Adam Steffi,
Ellern Arkady,
Seppelt Konrad
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
chemistry – a european journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.687
H-Index - 242
eISSN - 1521-3765
pISSN - 0947-6539
DOI - 10.1002/chem.19960020408
Subject(s) - ion , chemistry , coordination number , ideal (ethics) , electron , electronic structure , crystallography , bond length , crystal structure , inorganic chemistry , stereochemistry , computational chemistry , atomic physics , physics , organic chemistry , quantum mechanics , philosophy , epistemology
WF 6 , ReF n ( n = 6 and 7), and XeF 6 combined with NOF to give (NO + 2 ) WF   2− 8 , (NO + ) 2 ReF   2− 8 , and (NO + ) 2 XeF 2– 8 , respectively. Also NO 2 F reacted with ReF 6 to form (No 2 + )ReF 2– 8 . Cs 2 XeF 8 ·4BrF 5 crystallized from a solution of Cs 2 XeF 8 in BrF 5 . These five compounds were subjected to X‐ray structure determinations. The structure of [NO(NOF) 2 ] + IF – 8 was used as a standard for comparison. All anions exhibit square‐antiprismatic geometry, independent of their electronic configurations. Bond lenghts in ReF 2– 8 and XeF 2– 8 are larger than in WF 2– 8 and IF – 8 , owing to the presence of nonbonding electrons. Deviations from the ideal structure in XeF 2– 8 are attributed to cation‐anion interactions.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom