Premium
An evaluation of SIMCA. Part 2 — classification of pyrolysis mass spectra of pseudomonas and serratia bacteria by pattern recognition using the SIMCA classifier
Author(s) -
Dröge J. B. M.,
Rinsma W. J.,
Van 'T Klooster H. A.,
Tas A. C.,
Van Der Greef J.
Publication year - 1987
Publication title -
journal of chemometrics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.47
H-Index - 92
eISSN - 1099-128X
pISSN - 0886-9383
DOI - 10.1002/cem.1180010405
Subject(s) - pattern recognition (psychology) , artificial intelligence , classifier (uml) , outlier , mathematics , computer science
As part of a critical evaluation of the pattern recognition method SIMCA, three data sets containing pyrolysis mass spectra from bacteria were analysed using the SIMCA classifier. Each set consisted of two classes, Pseudomonas and Serratia bacteria, each class containing ten mass spectra and each mass spectrum having 285 spectral features. The results indicate that for these py‐MS data sets, with low object/feature ratio, the SIMCA classifier produces satisfactory results at the first classification level. At the second level, however, the classification results are not reliable, even after deleting outliers. A comparison of the cross‐validation method and Malinowski's indicator function for the determination of the number of significant principal components showed that the cross‐validation method is less stable and therefore less reliable than the indicator function.