Premium
Sorption‐Enhanced Steam Reforming of Ethanol: Thermodynamic Comparison of CO 2 Sorbents
Author(s) -
Wu Y. J.,
Díaz Alvarado F.,
Santos J. C.,
Gracia F.,
Cunha A. F.,
Rodrigues A. E.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
chemical engineering and technology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.403
H-Index - 81
eISSN - 1521-4125
pISSN - 0930-7516
DOI - 10.1002/ceat.201100534
Subject(s) - sorption , sorbent , steam reforming , ethanol , hydrotalcite , hydrogen , chemistry , hydrogen production , chemical engineering , gibbs free energy , adsorption , yield (engineering) , materials science , nuclear chemistry , organic chemistry , catalysis , thermodynamics , metallurgy , physics , engineering
A thermodynamic analysis is performed with a Gibbs free energy minimization method to compare the conventional steam reforming of ethanol (SRE) process and sorption‐enhanced SRE (SE‐SRE) with three different sorbents, namely, CaO, Li 2 ZrO 3 , and hydrotalcite‐like compounds (HTlc). As a result, the use of a CO 2 adsorbent can enhance the hydrogen yield and provide a lower CO content in the product gas at the same time. The best performance of SE‐SRE is found to be at 500 °C with an HTlc sorbent. Nearly 6 moles hydrogen per mole ethanol can be produced, when the CO content in the vent stream is less than 10 ppm, so that the hydrogen produced via SE‐SRE with HTlc sorbents can be directly used for fuel cells. Higher pressures do not favor the overall SE‐SRE process due to lower yielding of hydrogen, although CO 2 adsorption is enhanced.