Premium
Nutritional properties of pea protein‐enriched flour treated with different proteases to varying degrees of hydrolysis
Author(s) -
Konieczny Dellaney,
Stone Andrea K.,
Nosworthy Matthew G.,
House James D.,
Korber Darren R.,
Nickerson Michael T.,
Tanaka Takuji
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
cereal chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.558
H-Index - 100
eISSN - 1943-3638
pISSN - 0009-0352
DOI - 10.1002/cche.10258
Subject(s) - papain , hydrolysis , chemistry , trypsin , pepsin , hydrolysate , protease , amino acid , chymotrypsin , proteases , hydrolyzed protein , food science , pea protein , enzymatic hydrolysis , biochemistry , enzyme
Abstract Background and objectives Pulses are a good source of protein; however, they contain phytochemicals that can negatively affect the protein quality. Enzymatic hydrolysis could be a means to enhance the nutritional value of pea by improving the digestibility of the protein. To this aim, a commercial air‐classified pea protein‐enriched flour (PPEF) was hydrolyzed by different proteases (trypsin, Savinase, papain, and pepsin) to different degrees of hydrolysis (DH 2%–4% and 10%–12%) and levels of phytochemicals and in vitro protein digestibility corrected amino acid score were examined. Findings Protease treatments reduced the contents of condensed tannins and total phenolics, as well as trypsin inhibitor and chymotrypsin inhibitor activities. Hydrolysis at 10%–12% DH (degrees of hydrolysis) improved the amino acid score of the PPEF, but it was still limiting sulfur amino acids, whereas low levels of hydrolysis (DH 2%–4%) decreased the amino acid score. The in vitro protein digestibility score increased slightly following hydrolysis, with the greatest improvement in digestibility occurring with the papain treatment (DH 10%–12%). The in vitro protein digestibility corrected amino acid score with trypsin hydrolysis at DH 2%–4% was the lowest at 59.17%, whereas pepsin hydrolysis (10%–12% DH) gave the highest score (72.89%). Conclusions Specific hydrolysis treatments could be used to improve the overall nutrition of PPEF, enhancing the potential utilization of modified pea protein ingredients. Significance and novelty This study utilized four enzymes with different specificities resulting in PPEF hydrolysates with different protein quality even when the DH was the same. Increasing the nutritional quality of a PPEF may give it a competitive advantage over other pea ingredients.