Premium
Left atrial appendage occlusion in chicken‐wing anatomies: Imaging assessment, procedural, and clinical outcomes of the “sandwich technique”
Author(s) -
Freixa Xavier,
Tzikas Apostolos,
Aminian Adel,
FloresUmanzor Eduardo,
De Backer Ole,
Korsholm Kasper,
Ben Yedder Mohamed,
GonzalezFerreiro Rocío,
AgudeloMontañez Victor,
Gilhofer Thomas,
Simon François,
Samaras Athanasios,
Regueiro Ander,
Sondergaard Lars,
CruzGonzalez Ignacio,
Arzamendi Dabit,
Saw Jacqueline,
Ibrahim Reda,
NielsenKudsk Jens Erik
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
catheterization and cardiovascular interventions
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.988
H-Index - 116
eISSN - 1522-726X
pISSN - 1522-1946
DOI - 10.1002/ccd.29546
Subject(s) - medicine , left atrial appendage occlusion , percutaneous , occlusion , cardiac tamponade , ostium , atrial fibrillation , surgery , thrombosis , antithrombotic , cardiology , warfarin
Objectives To describe imaging assessment, procedural and follow‐up outcome of patients undergoing left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion (LAAO) using a “sandwich” technique. Background The presence of a LAA with chicken wing morphology constitutes a challenge that sometimes requires specific occlusion strategies like the “sandwich” technique. However, procedural and follow‐up data focusing on this implanting strategy is scarce. Methods This multicenter study collected individual data from eight centers between 2012 and 2019. Consecutive patients with chicken‐wing LAAs defined as an early (<20 mm from the ostium) and severe bend (>90°) who underwent LAAO with Amplatzer devices and using the “sandwich” technique were included in the analysis. Results Overall, 190 subjects were enrolled in the study. Procedures were done with the Amulet device (85%) and the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (15%). Successful implantation was achieved in 99.5% with ≤1 partial recapture in 80% of cases. Single (46.2%) and dual antiplatelet therapy (39.4%) were the most used antithrombotic therapies after LAAO. In‐hospital major adverse events rate was 1.5% with no deaths. One patient (0.5%) had cardiac tamponade requiring percutaneous drainage. With a mean follow‐up of 19.6 ± 14.8 months, the mortality and stroke rates were 7.7%/year and 2.5%/year, respectively. Follow‐up transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) at 2–3 months showed device‐related thrombosis in 2.8% and peri‐device leak ≥3 mm in 1.2% of patients. Conclusions In a large series of patients with chicken wing LAA anatomies undergoing LAAO, the use of the “sandwich” technique was feasible and safe. Preprocedural imaging was a key‐factor to determine specific measurements.