Premium
Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in the digital era: Meta‐analysis based on the reconstruction of time‐to‐event individual patient data
Author(s) -
Tarantini Giuseppe,
Giacoppo Daniele
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
catheterization and cardiovascular interventions
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.988
H-Index - 116
eISSN - 1522-726X
pISSN - 1522-1946
DOI - 10.1002/ccd.29079
Subject(s) - medicine , valve replacement , flexibility (engineering) , event (particle physics) , patient data , event data , aortic valve replacement , aortic valve , meta analysis , cardiovascular event , cardiology , intervention (counseling) , surgery , stenosis , database , data modeling , physics , quantum mechanics , myocardial infarction , computer science , statistics , mathematics , psychiatry
Key Points Clinical benefits of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) over surgery emerge soon after intervention and show durable, consistent trends within 1 year. TAVR by transfemoral access is associated with improved outcomes compared with TAVR by transthoracic access. Reconstructing time‐to‐event individual patient data is advantageous and allows higher flexibility in terms of meta‐analysis design and modeling of data.