Premium
Stent selection among patients with chronic kidney disease: Results from the NCDR CathPCI Registry
Author(s) -
Feldman Daniel A.,
Shroff Adhir R.,
Bao Haikun,
Curtis Jeptha P.,
Minges Karl E.,
Ardati Amer K.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
catheterization and cardiovascular interventions
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.988
H-Index - 116
eISSN - 1522-726X
pISSN - 1522-1946
DOI - 10.1002/ccd.28698
Subject(s) - medicine , conventional pci , kidney disease , percutaneous coronary intervention , stent , myocardial infarction , renal function , drug eluting stent , subgroup analysis , cardiology , coronary artery disease , population , confidence interval , surgery , environmental health
Objectives This study sought to define contemporary rates of drug eluting stent (DES) usage in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Background Among patients with CKD undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs), outcomes are superior for those who receive DES compared to those who receive bare metal stents (BMSs). However, perceived barriers may limit the use of DES in this population. Methods All adult PCI cases from the NCDR CathPCI Registry involving coronary stent placement between July 1, 2009 and December 31, 2015 were analyzed. The rate of DES usage was then compared among four groups, stratified by CKD stage (I/II, III, IV, and V). Subgroup analysis was conducted based on PCI status and indication. Cases were linked to Medicare claims data to assess 1‐year mortality. Results A total of 3,650,333 PCI cases met criteria for analysis. DES usage significantly declined as renal function worsened (83.0%, 79.9%, 75.6%, and 75.6%, respectively, in the four CKD stages; p < .001). DES usage was universally lower across the four groups in the setting of ST‐Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) (70.6%, 66.5%, 58.7%, 58.0%; p < .001) and higher in the setting of elective PCI (87.6%, 84.9%, 82.3%, 77.9%; p < .0001). DES was associated with improved 1‐year survival, and usage increased over time across each group. Conclusions DESs are underutilized in patients with advanced renal dysfunction. Although DES usage has increased over time, variation still exists between patients with normal renal function and those with CKD.