Premium
The impact of pre‐existing peripheral artery disease on transcatheter aortic valve implantation outcomes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Author(s) -
Ueshima Daisuke,
Barioli Alberto,
Nai Fovino Luca,
D'Amico Gianpiero,
Fabris Tommaso,
Brener Sorin J.,
Tarantini Giuseppe
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
catheterization and cardiovascular interventions
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.988
H-Index - 116
eISSN - 1522-726X
pISSN - 1522-1946
DOI - 10.1002/ccd.28335
Subject(s) - medicine , confidence interval , meta analysis , peripheral , cardiology , arterial disease , aortic valve , surgery , vascular disease
Background Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) plays a decisive role in the preinterventional selection process of the optimal vascular access site in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, the impact of PAD on mortality and vascular complications (VCs) in TAVI‐treated patients remains unclear. Accordingly, we aimed to assess the outcomes of patients with and without PAD undergoing TAVI, by performing a meta‐regression analysis. Methods Studies published between January 2002 and March 2018 and reporting outcomes according to the presence of PAD in TAVI patients were identified. Outcome measures analyzed were short‐, mid‐ and long‐term mortality, and peri‐procedural VC. The interaction between sheath size and PAD on outcomes was also assessed. Results A total of 26 studies (68,581 TAVI patients, of whom 17,326 with preprocedural PAD) were included in the analysis. Patients with PAD had higher risk of mortality at short‐ (HR 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13‐1.63, p = .0009), mid‐ (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.08‐1.30, p = .0005), and long‐term (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.24‐1.48, p < .0001) follow‐up, and higher risk of VC (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.27; 1.89, p < .0001). Moreover, the adoption of smaller sheaths during TAVI procedures was associated with fewer VC both in PAD and non‐PAD patients, but the latter group had a more pronounced benefit. Conclusions Patients with pre‐existent PAD are at increased risk of all‐cause mortality and VC after TAVI. The adoption of smaller sheaths during the procedure seems to be associated with fewer peri‐procedural VC both in PAD and non‐PAD patients.