Premium
Intravascular and hybrid intraoperative stent placement for baffle obstruction in transposition of the great arteries after atrial switch
Author(s) -
Poterucha Joseph T.,
Taggart Nathaniel W.,
Johnson Jonathan N.,
Can Bryan C.,
Cabalka Allison K.,
Hagler Donald J.,
Dearani Joseph A.,
Cetta Frank
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
catheterization and cardiovascular interventions
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.988
H-Index - 116
eISSN - 1522-726X
pISSN - 1522-1946
DOI - 10.1002/ccd.26783
Subject(s) - medicine , great arteries , baffle , stent , surgery , superior vena cava , inferior vena cava , stenosis , radiology , cardiac catheterization , cardiology , heart disease , chemical engineering , engineering
Objectives To report our experience with intravascular and hybrid intra‐operative stent placement for baffle obstruction in patients with complete transposition of the great arteries (TGA) after the atrial switch (Mustard/Senning) operation. Background Venous baffle obstruction is a challenging complication after atrial switch operation in patients with TGA. Traditional treatment options include intravascular stenting or surgery. Methods A retrospective analysis of Mayo Clinic's electronic medical record was completed to identify consecutive pediatric and adult patients with TGA after atrial switch who underwent baffle stent implantation from 1994 to 2015. Results Overall, 64 patients were referred for cardiac catheterization, in whom 47 (73%) were noted to have hemodynamic and angiographic evidence of baffle obstruction. A total of 20 patients mean age 33 (range: 8–46) years old underwent stent implantation of baffle stenosis at a mean of 33 (range: 7.5–45) years after initial atrial switch operation (Mustard, n = 19; Senning, n = 1). Overall, 27 baffles were stented in 20 patients via the following approaches: intravascular (17); hybrid surgical (3); staged intravascular & hybrid (2). Sites of stent placement were: superior vena cava (SVC) (13); inferior vena cava (IVC) (9); pulmonary venous baffle (5). Three patients had stent placement in the SVC and IVC baffles during the same procedure. Procedural adverse events occurred in 2/22 cases (9%) including creation of unintentional baffle leak ( n = 1) and stent migration ( n = 1). There was no procedure‐related mortality. At follow‐up (median 2, range 0.02–10 years), significantly improved NYHA class and mean Doppler baffle gradient were demonstrated ( P < 0.05). Mild baffle re‐stenosis (mean Doppler gradient; 2–3 mmHg) occurred in two patients who have not required re‐intervention. Trivial baffle leak was noted in four patients. Baffle re‐intervention was only occurred in one patient. One patient with pre‐procedural Class IV symptoms died 3.5 months after stent implantation. Conclusions This study is the largest reported experience of intravascular and intra‐operative hybrid stent placement for patients with TGA after atrial switch. Transcatheter and minimally invasive hybrid intraoperative surgical stent placement are an effective strategy for relief of systemic and pulmonary venous baffle obstruction. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.