z-logo
Premium
A comparison of the boomerang wire vascular access management system versus manual compression alone during percutaneous diagnostic and interventional cardiovascular procedures
Author(s) -
Echeverria Angela,
Krajcer Zvonimir
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
catheterization and cardiovascular interventions
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.988
H-Index - 116
eISSN - 1522-726X
pISSN - 1522-1946
DOI - 10.1002/ccd.26382
Subject(s) - medicine , percutaneous , vascular closure device , vascular access , psychological intervention , intensive care medicine , closure (psychology) , radiology , surgery , hemodialysis , psychiatry , economics , market economy
Key Points Vascular closure devices allow for early sheath removal, allowing for earlier patient mobilization The Boomerang vascular access management system does not alter arterial integrity for future interventions Access site complications provide significant morbidity in diagnostic and therapeutic interventions

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here