z-logo
Premium
Dual‐Source Computed Tomography for Chronic Total Occlusion of Coronary Arteries
Author(s) -
Singh Sandeep,
Singh Navreet,
Gulati Gurpreet S.,
Ramakrishnan Sivasubramanian,
Kumar Guresh,
Sharma Sanjiv,
Bahl Vinay K.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
catheterization and cardiovascular interventions
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.988
H-Index - 116
eISSN - 1522-726X
pISSN - 1522-1946
DOI - 10.1002/ccd.25516
Subject(s) - medicine , calcification , conventional pci , lesion , percutaneous coronary intervention , coronary arteries , occlusion , radiology , artery , angiography , cardiology , nuclear medicine , surgery , myocardial infarction
Objectives We compared dual‐source CT (DSCT) and conventional angiography (CA) in evaluation of chronic total occlusion (CTO) of coronary arteries. Background Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in CTO is technically difficult and has comparatively lower success rate than intervention in non‐occluded artery. Accurate assessment of lesion morphology is an important determinant of PCI success in CTO. Methods Nineteen symptomatic patients (18 men, age: 58.6 ± 10.6 years) with a CTO on CA were subjected to a DSCT (Definition, Siemens, Germany). Heart rate (HR) control was not performed. Dedicated post‐processing software was used for lesion analysis on both modalities. Presence of bridging collaterals, stump morphology, calcification, side branch, proximal tortuosity, occlusion length, distal vessel interpretability, and distal lesions were statistically compared. Results There were 20 CTOs. HR during DSCT ranged from 53 to 131 bpm. Bridging collaterals were seen in 3/20 (15%) lesions on CA and in none on DSCT. Stump anatomy and side branch were identified equally well. Plaque calcification was identified in 5/20 (25%) lesions on CA and in 12/20 (60%) lesions on DSCT ( P  = 0.025). Nature and extent of calcification were better visualized on DSCT. No proximal tortuosity was noted. Distal vessel was better interpretable on DSCT (15/20; 75%) compared to CA (9/20; 45%) ( P  = 0.05). No significant difference in lesion length was noted. Conclusion DSCT performs as well as CA for most features of CTO. Avoidance of need to control HR, ability to better detect and characterize calcium and to interpret distal vessels make it a useful pre‐intervention investigation. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here