Premium
Enhanced stent imaging improves the diagnosis of stent underexpansion and optimizes stent deployment
Author(s) -
Sanidas Elias A.,
Maehara Akiko,
Barkama Ravit,
Mintz Gary S.,
Singh Varinder,
Hidalgo Ariel,
Hakim Diaa,
Leon Martin B.,
Moses Jeffrey W.,
Weisz Giora
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
catheterization and cardiovascular interventions
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.988
H-Index - 116
eISSN - 1522-726X
pISSN - 1522-1946
DOI - 10.1002/ccd.24353
Subject(s) - medicine , stent , radiology , intravascular ultrasound , angiography , coronary angiography , nuclear medicine , myocardial infarction
Objectives To investigate the clinical value and diagnostic accuracy of enhanced stent imaging (ESI) as compared with quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Background ESI is an image acquisition and processing angiography‐based software that improves visualization and provides measurements of deployed stents. Methods A total of 40 consecutive patients (42 stents) were studied. Stent deployment was evaluated sequentially and independently by angiography, ESI, and IVUS. Following each imaging modality, the operator determined the necessity of postdilation unrelated to the other modalities. Stent diameters were measured off‐line by QCA, ESI, and IVUS at several sites along the deployed stent and compared. Results Following stent deployment and based solely on angiography, the operator decided to postdilate seven of the 42 stents (16.7%). This decision was not changed after reviewing the ESI images of these seven stents. Of the 35 stents not requiring postdilation based on angiography alone, ESI influenced the operator to change the decision and postdilate 10 of 35 stents (28.6%). The ESI‐based measurements had better correlation with IVUS ( r = 0.721, P < 0.0001) than did QCA with IVUS ( r = 0.563, P < 0.0001). Bland‐Altman analysis showed a trend towards better agreement between ESI and IVUS than between QCA and IVUS (mean differences = 0.038 vs. 0.121; P = 0.19, respectively). Conclusions ESI is an easy to use modality that enhances stent visualization, helps in the decision making process whether to postdilate the stent, and provides estimation of stent expansion with better correlations than QCA when compared to IVUS. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.