z-logo
Premium
Clinical use of temporary percutaneous left ventricular assist devices
Author(s) -
Froesch Patric,
Martinelli Michele,
Meier Pascal,
Cook Stéphane,
Hullin Roger,
Windecker Stephan,
Mohacsi Paul,
Meier Bernhard
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
catheterization and cardiovascular interventions
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.988
H-Index - 116
eISSN - 1522-726X
pISSN - 1522-1946
DOI - 10.1002/ccd.22948
Subject(s) - cardiogenic shock , medicine , impella , conventional pci , percutaneous coronary intervention , percutaneous , cardiology , ventricular assist device , shock (circulatory) , ventricular function , retrospective cohort study , surgery , heart failure , myocardial infarction
Background : Temporary percutaneous left ventricular assist devices (TPLVAD) can be inserted and removed in awake patients. They substitute left ventricular function for a period of up to a few weeks and provide an excellent backup and bridge to recovery or decision.Methods : Retrospective analysis of 75 patients who received TPLVAD to treat cardiogenic shock ( n = 49) or to facilitate high‐risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) ( n = 26). Forty‐two patients with cardiogenic shock and 16 patients with high‐risk PCI received a TandemHeart and 7 patients and 10 patients, respectively, received an Impella Recover LP 2.5. Outcome and related complications up to 1 month are reported with reference to device depending function.Results : One‐month survival was 53% in patients with shock and 96% in patients with PCI.Conclusion : TPLVADs can support the failing heart with acceptable risk. Outcome is better in prophylactic use than in patients with cardiogenic shock. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom