Premium
Stenting of aortic coarctation: Acute, intermediate, and long‐term results of a prospective multi‐institutional registry—Congenital cardiovascular interventional study consortium (CCISC)
Author(s) -
Holzer Ralf,
Qureshi Shakeel,
Ghasemi Abdolrahim,
Vincent Julie,
Sievert Horst,
Gruenstein Daniel,
Weber Howard,
Alday Luis,
Peirone Alejandro,
Zellers Thomas,
Cheatham John,
Slack Michael,
Rome Jonathan
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
catheterization and cardiovascular interventions
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.988
H-Index - 116
eISSN - 1522-726X
pISSN - 1522-1946
DOI - 10.1002/ccd.22587
Subject(s) - medicine , coarctation of the aorta , stent , blood pressure , surgery , aneurysm , aortic dissection , cardiology , aorta
Since the 1980s, stent implantation has evolved as an important therapeutic strategy for coarctation of the aorta. However, available data is frequently flawed by short follow‐up, lack of adequate follow‐up imaging, and retrospective nature of data collection. Methods : Data was prospectively collected using a multicenter registry congenital cardiovascular interventional study consortium (CCISC). Between 2000 and 2009, 302 patients from 34 centers with a median weight of 58 kg underwent stent implantation for coarctation. Eligible patients (44%) completed intermediate follow‐up (3–18 months) with integrated imaging (cath, CT, MRI), whereas 21% completed long‐term follow‐up (>18–60 months). Procedural success was defined as UL/LL systolic gradient of less than 20 mm Hg, lack of significant recurrent obstruction, and freedom from unplanned repeat intervention. Results: Acute procedural success was 96%. Cumulative intermediate success was 86%, and cumulative long‐term success was 77%. Unplanned repeat interventions were required in 4%, and aortic wall complications were seen in 1% of patients (dissection n = 1 and aneurysm n = 3). Other adverse events ( n = 15) occurred mainly acutely and included technical complications such as stent malposition ( n = 9). At long‐term follow‐up, 23% of patients continued to have systolic blood pressure above the 95th centile, 9% had an upper‐to‐lower limb blood pressure gradient in excess of 20 mm Hg, and 32% were taking antihypertensive medication. Conclusions: This study documented acute, intermediate, and long‐term outcome data comparable or superior with other surgical or interventional series. However, even with successful initial stent therapy, patients continue to require long‐term follow‐up and have associated long‐term morbidity, relating to aortic wall complications, systemic hypertension, recurrent obstruction as well as need for repeat intervention. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.