Premium
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for high risk patients With severe aortic stenosis using the Edwards Sapien balloon‐expandable bioprosthesis: A single centre study with immediate and medium‐term outcomes
Author(s) -
Osten Mark D.,
Feindel Christopher,
Greutmann Matthias,
Chamberlain Kristeen,
Meineri Massimiliano,
Rubin Barry,
Mezody Melitta,
Ivanov Joan,
Butany Jagdish,
Horlick Eric M.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
catheterization and cardiovascular interventions
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.988
H-Index - 116
eISSN - 1522-726X
pISSN - 1522-1946
DOI - 10.1002/ccd.22291
Subject(s) - medicine , stenosis , cardiology , balloon , euroscore , surgery , mitral regurgitation , regurgitation (circulation) , aortic valve stenosis , aortic valve , aortic valve replacement , cardiac surgery
Background : Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TCAVI) is an emerging alternative therapy to open‐heart surgery in high‐risk patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Methods : Between January 2007 and May 2009, 46 patients underwent TCAVI with the 23 mm or 26 mm Edwards Sapien bioprosthesis via either the transapical (TA‐AVI) or transfemoral (TF‐AVI) approach. All patients had an estimated operative mortality risk of >15%. Results : A total of 46 patients (30 TA‐AVI, 16 TF‐AVI) with a mean aortic valve area (AVA) of 0.63 ± 0.2 cm 2 and mean gradient of 54 ± 16 mm Hg were treated. Predicted operative mortality was 25.3% by logistic Euroscore and 8.7% by Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score. Procedural success was 93% in the TA‐AVI group and 88% in the TF‐AVI group. There was one intraprocedural death in the TA‐AVI group. Overall 30‐day mortality was 6.5% (2‐TA‐AVI, 1‐TF‐AVI). Four patients (9.5%) died from noncardiac causes after 30 days. Successful TCAVI was associated with a significant increase in AVA from 0.6 ± 0.1 cm 2 to 1.6 ± 0.6 cm 2 in the TA‐AVI group and 0.6 ± 0.1 cm 2 to 1.4 ± 0.2 cm 2 in the TF‐AVI group at a mean follow up of 7.4 ± 4.4 and 8.3 ± 5.0 months, respectively. At discharge, there was significant improvement in AVA ( P < 0.0001), transaortic mean gradient ( P < 0.0001), and mitral regurgitation ( P = 0.01). At medium term follow up, the valve area was maintained and there was significant improvement in NYHA class in both groups ( P < 0.0001). Conclusion : At medium term follow‐up, both transcatheter approaches demonstrated good valve durability with no cardiac‐related mortality post hospital discharge. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.